On 15/09/2014 09:43, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> Mantis issue
> http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=26723
Test case and patch attached to bugtracker issue.
Thanks,
Reinier
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists
On 13 September 2014 20:29, vfclists . wrote:
>
>
> On 13 September 2014 20:02, Sven Barth
> wrote:
>
>> On 13.09.2014 20:13, vfclists . wrote:
>>
>>> According to the docs the with statement when used with mulltiple
>>> objects only works with the last parameter.
>>>
>>>
>>> The statement
>>>
>
On 08/09/14 17:34, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> On 09/07/2014 05:19 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
>> How can I read the value of field FParent which is located in object
>> "Self" ?
>
> That's not that difficult:
>
> p this
> p this.fparent
You can also use "self". You don't even have t
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:30:01PM +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, J?rgen Hestermann said:
> -
> d:=TreeRoot.SubDirs[Low(TreeRoot.SubDirs)]; // local var d
> d^.DirLogged := true;
> d^.DirHatFocus
Am 15.09.2014 09:08 schrieb "Graeme Geldenhuys" <
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk>:
>
> On 2014-09-14 13:30, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > WITH doesn't, and you risk that if your class or one of its ancestor has
> > such property, and your error goes unnoticed.
>
> +1
>
> Not to mention that you can'
Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
PL/1 was designed in the mid 60s, and Wirth of course knew about PL/1,
because he was at IBM at the time, and of course he was aware of the
problems and pitfalls of PL/1.
I didn't know that Wirth had been directly associated with IBM. I did
know that while at Stanford h
In our previous episode, Xiangrong Fang said:
> If my application needs SPEED, i.e. take full advantage of CPU
> capabilities, and the application has no I/O operation at all (neither disk
> nor network), it seems no need to create threads more than the number of
> CPU cores ?hyper-threads)?
>
> A
Hi All,
If my application needs SPEED, i.e. take full advantage of CPU
capabilities, and the application has no I/O operation at all (neither disk
nor network), it seems no need to create threads more than the number of
CPU cores （hyper-threads)?
Am I right?
Xiangrong
___
On 09/13/2014 12:59 AM, Dennis Poon wrote:
I am trying to use an external C++ dll
Usually you can't use (pure) C++ DLLs. DLLS need to have a "flat" (ANSI
C) interface using standard data types and calling conventions.
I suppose with x86/64 the return value in fact is 8 bytes in a single
regis
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
As already mentioned, human refactoring of WITH statements can, and has,
caused lots of debugging issues afterwards.
If Dijkstra had written a letter to the CACM cautioning against the With
statement, I wonder whether Wirth would have headlined it "With
Statement Con
On 15/09/2014 00:54, José Mejuto wrote:
> El 13/09/2014 17:34, Reinier Olislagers escribió:
> For some reason the bindings in Pascal, and/or the wand bindings (maybe
> internally to imagemagick) are broken.
Mmmm, if the wand bindings were broken that would surely have lead to
many more people compl
On 2014-09-14 13:30, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> WITH doesn't, and you risk that if your class or one of its ancestor has
> such property, and your error goes unnoticed.
+1
Not to mention that you can't use tooltip debugging when it comes to the
WITH statement - at least this was the case last ti
On 2014-09-14 15:41, Vojtěch Čihák wrote:
> because Editor is also public property of TStringGrid. Here would be
> solution to rename parameter to "AEditor".
Yes, that is a classic issue I have often come across.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free
On 2014-09-14 11:49, Sven Barth wrote:
> Though to be honest Lazarus handles with-statements in context of debugging
> much more gracefully than Delphi...
We all know Lazarus is way better that Delphi - so that's always good to
know. :)
As already mentioned, human refactoring of WITH statements c
On Mon, September 15, 2014 07:55, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 14.09.2014 18:05, Philippe wrote:
>> someone wrote about a better performance using "with". is that true?
>> even with a simple pointer as in:
.
.
> This is the relevant code generated for TestWith:
>
> === asm begin ===
>
> # [28] with p^
15 matches
Mail list logo
