> I have the feeling that the introduction of dynamic packages in FPC *will*
> require us to change our current RTTI from PTypeInfo to PPTypeInfo... :/
>
> Regards,
> Sven
>
So better to do it earlier rather than later ;P
Regards,
Maciej Izak (hnb)
___
On 31.05.2014 15:45, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Maciej Izak said:
By Barry Kelly in comment :) :
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3443097/what-is-the-identity-pointer-before-a-ttypeinfo-there-for
"all typeinfo fixups - pointers from one blob of typeinfo to another - a
On 08.06.2014 17:03, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I've also introduced an enhanced GetPropInfo() with a signature as
follows:
function tiGetPropInfo(AClass: TClass; PropPath: string; PInstance:
Pointer): PPropInfo;
Might also profit from a declaration as "inline" :)
This one might not work as
2014-06-08 21:50 GMT+02:00 Graeme Geldenhuys
:
> Hi,
>
> I think it was FPC 2.6.0 that changed the language rules about
> Properties. You can't pass them directly as a var parameter, can't
> assign to a property of a property etc.
>
> Anyway, somebody recently asked my why this was implemented, a
