Am 21.05.2014 17:53 schrieb "Craig Peterson" :
> I don't mind keeping a fork of a stable release with the feature
> backported, if that's what it takes, though obviously I'd prefer it to
> be in properly. Sven, if you're still following the thread, would a
> bounty help bump the priority enough for
On 2014-05-21 15:44, Peter Brooks wrote:
I took AStringList.Add() to mean that it added the string to the list
of strings - I was wrong..
How were you wrong about that? That's exactly what it does.
Looks to me you were wrong about LoadFromStream.
--
Cheers!
Rich Saunders
On Wed, 21 May 2014 21:44:10 +0200
Peter Brooks wrote:
> Yes, thank you. The best thing I've learned is to be suspicious of examples...
>
> I've got it now, thank you all for the assistance.
>
> I took AStringList.Add() to mean that it added the string to the list
> of strings - I was wrong..
>
Yes, thank you. The best thing I've learned is to be suspicious of examples...
I've got it now, thank you all for the assistance.
I took AStringList.Add() to mean that it added the string to the list
of strings - I was wrong..
I did note that the example said that it was flawed, but, foolishly,
On 5/21/2014 7:00 AM, Peter Brooks wrote:
AStringList.LoadFromStream(Aprocess.Output);
AStringList.LoadFromStream(AProcess.Stderr);
AStringList.LoadFromStream(AProcess.Output);
[quote]
LoadFromStream loads the contents of Stream into the stringlist. Each line in
the stream (as marked
On 5/15/2014 12:58 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
> As Michal said, someone was working on that, but I didn't hear anything
> from him in the past year or so... maybe when I find the time and have
> some other topics removed from my list I'll look into reintegrating and
> finishing what he has begun...
I s
On 5/18/2014 2:34 AM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> I wanted only to point out that personally I would first work on OpenMP
> support than implementing
> anonymous methods (which I consider anyways very un-pascalish) and closures.
That's fair. I wouldn't expect anyone who's philosophically opposed to
On 21/05/2014 16:36, Peter Brooks wrote:
> Unfortunately, I've tried both the full path and just the name -
> apparently TProcess is supposed to look in the path - and it does
> work. When it is called, it returns a '0' indicating successful
> completion.
/disclaimer: haven't looked at your code/
On 21/05/2014 17:02, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> On 21/05/2014 16:36, Peter Brooks wrote:
>> Unfortunately, I've tried both the full path and just the name -
>> apparently TProcess is supposed to look in the path - and it does
>> work. When it is called, it returns a '0' indicating successful
>> co
Peter Brooks wrote:
Unfortunately, I've tried both the full path and just the name -
apparently TProcess is supposed to look in the path - and it does
work. When it is called, it returns a '0' indicating successful
completion.
I just tried it again with /sbin/ping instead of ping and the
behavio
Unfortunately, I've tried both the full path and just the name -
apparently TProcess is supposed to look in the path - and it does
work. When it is called, it returns a '0' indicating successful
completion.
I just tried it again with /sbin/ping instead of ping and the
behaviour is just the same.
On 21/05/2014 15:01, Paul Breneman wrote:
> I've been working with running Linux on an Android tablet (without
> rooting the device) and one thing I've seen mentioned is that ping
> requires higher priorities (I don't remember the details). You can read
> more here:
> http://turbocontrol.com/gnu
Peter,
I've been working with running Linux on an Android tablet (without
rooting the device) and one thing I've seen mentioned is that ping
requires higher priorities (I don't remember the details). You can read
more here:
http://turbocontrol.com/gnuroot.htm
Best regards,
Paul
www.TurboC
On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:00:58 +0200
Peter Brooks wrote:
> Sorry, I misled you. I did move it higher up, earlier, to test
> something, and I forgot to put it back.
>
> This version has exactly the same behaviour:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 peterbrooks wheel 0 21 May 13:00 output.txt
>
> Program nm
Peter Brooks wrote:
Sorry, I misled you. I did move it higher up, earlier, to test
something, and I forgot to put it back.
This version has exactly the same behaviour:
AStringList.LoadFromStream(AProcess.Output);
What is this replacing the current content with?
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markM
Sorry, I misled you. I did move it higher up, earlier, to test
something, and I forgot to put it back.
This version has exactly the same behaviour:
-rw-r--r-- 1 peterbrooks wheel 0 21 May 13:00 output.txt
Program nmp(input,output);
uses
Classes, SysUtils, Process;
var
AProcess: TPr
On Wed, 21 May 2014 11:11:11 +0200
Peter Brooks wrote:
> I've got a little program that just pings. It runs. I get a 0 error
> return, but there doesn't seem to be any output:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 21 May 11:09 output.txt
>
> So it's re-writing the output.txt file, but the
> written(
I've got a little program that just pings. It runs. I get a 0 error
return, but there doesn't seem to be any output:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 21 May 11:09 output.txt
So it's re-writing the output.txt file, but the
written(AstringList.Text) isn't putting anything there.
This is almost a dire
On Wed, May 21, 2014 08:16, mokashe.ram wrote:
> Thanks for Your Help,
>
> But facing the same issue using the last post code :)
Then please include fully compilable source which does not work for you. I
tested it yesterday by I adding a basic main program body with four lines
consisting of InitVi
19 matches
Mail list logo
