Re: [fpc-pascal] Mirror empty

2014-03-05 Thread LacaK
Mattias Gaertner wrote / napísal(a): On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 22:01:37 +0100 Florian Klämpfl wrote: Am 05.03.2014 19:26, schrieb Mattias Gaertner: The fpc mirror http://www.hu.freepascal.org/ is empty. http://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/lazarus is available again. Thank You!

Re: [fpc-pascal] Mirror empty

2014-03-05 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 22:01:37 +0100 Florian Klämpfl wrote: > Am 05.03.2014 19:26, schrieb Mattias Gaertner: > > > > The fpc mirror http://www.hu.freepascal.org/ is empty. > > http://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/lazarus is available again. Thank You! Mattias ___

Re: [fpc-pascal] Mirror empty

2014-03-05 Thread Florian Klämpfl
Am 05.03.2014 19:26, schrieb Mattias Gaertner: > > The fpc mirror http://www.hu.freepascal.org/ is empty. http://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/lazarus is available again. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cg

Re: [fpc-pascal] Mirror empty

2014-03-05 Thread Sven Barth
On 05.03.2014 19:26, Mattias Gaertner wrote: The fpc mirror http://www.hu.freepascal.org/ is empty. Who is responsible for it? To quote a mail from me to the Lazarus list from 6th February which was answered by Vincent: 2014-02-05 Sven Barth : Hello together! I have the feeling

[fpc-pascal] FPC for ARMv4

2014-03-05 Thread Jon
Hi I have a board running Linux - it reports itself as armv4tl: root@phidgetsbc:~# uname -a Linux phidgetsbc 3.1.6 #3 PREEMPT Fri Jan 6 13:05:50 MST 2012 armv4tl GNU/Linux root@phidgetsbc:~# cat /etc/issue Debian GNU/Linux 6.0 \n \l After trying and failing to install a cross-compiler on my Li

[fpc-pascal] Mirror empty

2014-03-05 Thread Mattias Gaertner
The fpc mirror http://www.hu.freepascal.org/ is empty. Who is responsible for it? Mattias ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Generic String Functions

2014-03-05 Thread Michael Schnell
On 03/05/2014 12:10 PM, Michael Schnell wrote: (sorry if sounding harsh, but that is what simple logic dictated) .. And if you think that I am a troll, as I keep nagging on something I technically can't help to make it happen (because I am not knowledgeable enough to do any modifications to t

Re: [fpc-pascal] Generic String Functions

2014-03-05 Thread Michael Schnell
On 02/28/2014 05:06 PM, Sven Barth wrote: - "non-Raw" does not allow for modifying the type and code-length fields Yes, but you can always do it by converting to RawByteString: Of course but then there is no auto conversion any more. The start of the discussion was using a type that _both_

Re: [fpc-pascal] Generic String Functions

2014-03-05 Thread Michael Schnell
On 02/28/2014 05:06 PM, Sven Barth wrote: Work on final documentation will be started when 2.8/3.0 will be released. Till then wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_Unicode_Support can be considered the documentation. Please note that the non existance of a documentation does not mean that a feature is not c

Re: [fpc-pascal] Generic String Functions

2014-03-05 Thread Michael Schnell
On 02/28/2014 04:48 PM, Sven Barth wrote: The string type itself is fully functional as far as I know. Yep. The meaning of "fully functional" is what we are discussing here. No. I would not introduce yet another string type, but try to merge the existing string types instead as they all sha