On 10/29/2013 6:53 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
waldo kitty wrote:
Another
useful variant is giving *the* *last* parameter an optional value, which will
allow you to omit the parameter:
procedure MyObject.MyRoutine(const VarA : string; VarB: integer= -1);
very interesting... will this work w
waldo kitty wrote:
Another
useful variant is giving *the* *last* parameter an optional value,
which will
allow you to omit the parameter:
procedure MyObject.MyRoutine(const VarA : string; VarB: integer= -1);
very interesting... will this work with both parameters, too? i don't
think i need
In our previous episode, Robert Wolfe said:
> I am wanting to get into learning and doing some Linux socket
> programming in FPC. However, the tutorials I have found all do not seem
> to work with the latest iteration of FPC 2.6 (the ones I've found will
> only work with 2.0.0 only).
>
> If an
On 10/29/2013 03:52 PM, Robert Wolfe wrote:
Hi all!
I am wanting to get into learning and doing some Linux socket
programming in FPC. However, the tutorials I have found all do not seem
to work with the latest iteration of FPC 2.6 (the ones I've found will
only work with 2.0.0 only).
If anyone
Hi all!
I am wanting to get into learning and doing some Linux socket
programming in FPC. However, the tutorials I have found all do not seem
to work with the latest iteration of FPC 2.6 (the ones I've found will
only work with 2.0.0 only).
If anyone knows of where I could find some updated
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> Yes, works... but the language allow hide the unit name and nobody
> uses unit name as an identifier in 99% of cases, Am I right? So,
> problems can be happen.
>
> From my experience I'd say no.
I actually had to use the explicit unit name
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> You didn't understand.
> The namespace we talk about is like a "dinamic namespace". The
> programmer can choose which "names" he will use in your projects when
> these projects are using third-party frameworks.
> In Java, eg, you can change
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Ewald wrote:
> Once upon a time, Marcos Douglas said:
>> Do you (all) use prefix in Procedures and/or Functions too? ;-)
> Unitname.GetHandler() ?
Yes, works... but the language allow hide the unit name and nobody
uses unit name as an identifier in 99% of cases, A
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:31 PM, leledumbo wrote:
>> Another type of conflict happens -- but no one talks about it -- using
> procedure/function with the same parameters in different units.
> Eg: GetHandler(); If you use two units that have a GetHandler
> function, in a third unit, you have a tro
On 10/29/2013 2:35 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
waldo kitty wrote:
example: procedure MyObject.MyRoutine;
procedure MyObject.MyRoutine(VarA : SomeType);
procedure MyObject.MyRoutine(VarA : string; VarB: integer);
at one point, the first instance would be used... at another
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Reimar Grabowski wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:22:47 -0200
> Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
>> Do you (all) use prefix in Procedures and/or Functions too? ;-)
> Nope, we use classes and methods instead of global procedures and functions.
> ;)
Me too but, unfortunat
On 10/29/2013 1:56 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 29.10.2013 18:21 schrieb "waldo kitty" :
> example: procedure MyObject.MyRoutine;
> procedure MyObject.MyRoutine(VarA : SomeType);
> procedure MyObject.MyRoutine(VarA : string; VarB: integer);
>
> at one point, the first instan
waldo kitty wrote:
question: in simple language, how can i have a routine with differing
parameters like some routines in FPC and Lazarus do? i've never
attempted this before and it is completely alien to my experience but i
do use the functionality quite a lot with existing routines...
descr
Once upon a time, Marcos Douglas said:
> Do you (all) use prefix in Procedures and/or Functions too? ;-)
Unitname.GetHandler() ?
--
Ewald
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pasca
Am 29.10.2013 18:21 schrieb "waldo kitty" :
>
>
> question: in simple language, how can i have a routine with differing
parameters like some routines in FPC and Lazarus do? i've never attempted
this before and it is completely alien to my experience but i do use the
functionality quite a lot with e
On 29/10/13 18:17, John Lee wrote:
On 29 October 2013 13:22, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
This is a very impressive little blog about efficient string concatenation
in Delphi. But it also applies to Free Pascal.
http://www.delphitools.info/2013/10/28/efficient-string-concatenation-in-delphi/
>
question: in simple language, how can i have a routine with differing parameters
like some routines in FPC and Lazarus do? i've never attempted this before and
it is completely alien to my experience but i do use the functionality quite a
lot with existing routines...
description: i have a c
Did you try any other fpc compiler optimisation settings? No expert, but
looks like it isn't too difficult for compiler to spot this.
What about llvm - (coming soon to fpc apparently) - would that fix it?
John
On 29 October 2013 13:22, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a very impres
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, John Lee wrote:
Is this assessment valid for win or linux or both? J
Both.
To my knowledge, Graeme works on both platforms equally.
I myself am biased towards Linux, but I do have knowledge
of people using it extensively on Windows.
Michael.
> Another type of conflict happens -- but no one talks about it -- using
procedure/function with the same parameters in different units.
Eg: GetHandler(); If you use two units that have a GetHandler
function, in a third unit, you have a trouble.
Do you (all) use prefix in Procedures and/or Fun
Is this assessment valid for win or linux or both? J
On 28 October 2013 13:22, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 28/10/2013 at 15:03, silvioprog wrote:
>
> So, which one is recommended to be used in production?
>
>
> Having recently (and currently still) doing extensive work with embedde
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:22:47 -0200
Marcos Douglas wrote:
> Do you (all) use prefix in Procedures and/or Functions too? ;-)
Nope, we use classes and methods instead of global procedures and functions. ;)
R.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 29/10/2013 at 03:50, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
>
>>
>> Then the John Douglas and Douglas McKey are running into the same issue.
>>
>> Both guys (while living on different parts of the world) created the same
>> "douglas" nam
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> > Both guys (while living on different parts of the world) created the
> > same "douglas" namespace!
>
> OK, ok, my example was bad. I would apply the exact same namespace
> rules as recommended by Java. In a real situation you should use your
2013/10/29 Michael Van Canneyt
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, silvioprog wrote:
>
>> 2013/10/28 Graeme Geldenhuys
>> On Monday 28/10/2013 at 15:03, silvioprog wrote:
>> So, which one is recommended to be used in production?
>>
>> Having recently (and currently still) doing extensive work wit
On 29 Oct 2013, at 14:35, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Jonas Maebe wrote:
I think they use "evaluation order" as a synonym for "parameter
passing order" on that page, given the table below: it says that
the order in which the parameters are passed for register/pascal i
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, silvioprog wrote:
2013/10/28 Graeme Geldenhuys
On Monday 28/10/2013 at 15:03, silvioprog wrote:
So, which one is recommended to be used in production?
Having recently (and currently still) doing extensive work with embedded HTTP
servers, I tested many (Pow
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 29 Oct 2013, at 09:44, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
The Delphi documentation is however rather vague:
http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/XE5/en/Procedures_and_Functions#Calling_Conventions
I know this,
On 29 Oct 2013, at 09:44, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
The Delphi documentation is however rather vague:
http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/XE5/en/Procedures_and_Functions#Calling_Conventions
I know this, and it says explicitly
"For the register a
2013/10/28 Graeme Geldenhuys
> On Monday 28/10/2013 at 15:03, silvioprog wrote:
>
> So, which one is recommended to be used in production?
>
>
> Having recently (and currently still) doing extensive work with embedded
> HTTP servers, I tested many (Powtils, Indy, tiWebServer, FPC, nYume etc). I
>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
> wrote:
>>
>> I would have thought that is exactly what namespaces will be handy for! Or
>> at least a popular use-case. Macros Douglas could define a "douglas"
>> namespace, and the
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 28/10/2013 at 15:20, leledumbo wrote:
>
>
> Namespace does NOT solve the problem. If MSE units uses M. for their
> units and you have yours the same as well, you'll end up renaming either
> anyway.
>
>
> I would have though
On Monday 28/10/2013 at 11:51, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Any ideas why this is happening?
Just a quick progress update...
It seems it wasn't the fcl-web HTTP Server or CGI clients at fault,
but rather an Embedded Firebird shared access problem on Windows Vista
and later. The webserver ap
On Tuesday 29/10/2013 at 03:50, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
Then the John Douglas and Douglas McKey are running into the same
issue.
Both guys (while living on different parts of the world) created the
same "douglas" namespace!
OK, ok, my example was bad. I would apply the exact same
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:48:33 -0400
Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
> Is it much different than just extending the prefix "M" to "MFP"?
Of course it is not, actually it's about the same, as you know. IMHO it's not
even a feature just another horrible idea of the Delphi guys used to get their
VCL and F
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 29.10.2013 08:35 schrieb "Michael Van Canneyt" :
>
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Dmitry Pribysh wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As it is written in Free Pascal wiki, order of parameter evaluation is not
defined in FPC, but it is defined in Delphi
(Delphi
>> gu
On 29 Oct 2013, at 08:35, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Dmitry Pribysh wrote:
>
>> As it is written in Free Pascal wiki, order of parameter evaluation is not
>> defined in FPC, but it is defined in Delphi (Delphi
>> guarantees left-to-right evaluation order).
>
> Strange.
Am 29.10.2013 08:35 schrieb "Michael Van Canneyt" :
>
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Dmitry Pribysh wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As it is written in Free Pascal wiki, order of parameter evaluation is
not defined in FPC, but it is defined in Delphi (Delphi
>> guarantees left-to-right evaluation order).
>
>
> S
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Dmitry Pribysh wrote:
Hi,
As it is written in Free Pascal wiki, order of parameter evaluation is not
defined in FPC, but it is defined in Delphi (Delphi
guarantees left-to-right evaluation order).
Strange. Where is that documented ?
Michael.__
Bart wrote:
On 10/28/13, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
For windows there is winutils.iswindowsadmin(), for unix likes there is
fpgeteuid (which should return zero for root).
Also remember unix-style capabilities.
Care to elaborate on that?
You can use the setcap utility to add or remove capab
41 matches
Mail list logo
