On 10/27/13, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> For windows there is winutils.iswindowsadmin(), for unix likes there is
> fpgeteuid (which should return zero for root).
Thanks a lot.
Bart
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lis
In our previous episode, Marcos Douglas said:
> Yes and how I still use D7 at work I still have this problem.
> This problem happen not only for unit names but component names too. I
> can not register two components with the same name.
True. But is maybe because RTTI (and .classname) didn't allow
In our previous episode, Bart said:
>
> I thought of trying to write to a "protected" location (/etc/something
> on linux, C:\ProgramData\something on Windows), but the problem is
> that Windows virtualizes these calls (it'll end up somewhere lse,
> where your program will never find it again), so
Hi,
In my program I have some functions that must only be enabled if the
program is invoked as root (linux) / administrator (windows).
Is there some cross platform way to detect this?
I thought of trying to write to a "protected" location (/etc/something
on linux, C:\ProgramData\something on Win
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Fabrício Srdic
wrote:
> 2013/10/27 Marco van de Voort
>>
>> In our previous episode, Marcos Douglas said:
>> > > Namespaces are only for pseudo hierarchical disambiguation of unit
>> > > names in
>> > > Pascal.
>> >
>> > Very true. I agree with everything.
>> > B
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Marcos Douglas said:
>> > Namespaces are only for pseudo hierarchical disambiguation of unit names in
>> > Pascal.
>>
>> Very true. I agree with everything.
>> BUT, IMHO, the only problem is if you have two 3rd
2013/10/27 Marco van de Voort
> In our previous episode, Marcos Douglas said:
> > > Namespaces are only for pseudo hierarchical disambiguation of unit
> names in
> > > Pascal.
> >
> > Very true. I agree with everything.
> > BUT, IMHO, the only problem is if you have two 3rd frameworks that use
>
In our previous episode, Marcos Douglas said:
> > Namespaces are only for pseudo hierarchical disambiguation of unit names in
> > Pascal.
>
> Very true. I agree with everything.
> BUT, IMHO, the only problem is if you have two 3rd frameworks that use
> the same unit name. In that case I can not ad
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Fabr?cio Srdic said:
>> > used in Java and .NET as either languages don't have "units".
>> > Adding "features" just because "enterpise-class dev platforms" have them
>> > is more marketing move, than actual tech
2013/10/27 Michael Van Canneyt
>
>
> Ah. The 'private' constructor is called FROM ANOTHER INSTANCE. You didn't
> say that.
>
> That currently can't be done.
>
> Michael.
So, in this case, can/should I make my constructor private, ignoring the
warning, or just make it public to "play it safe"?
2013/10/27 Marco van de Voort
> In our previous episode, Fabr?cio Srdic said:
> > > used in Java and .NET as either languages don't have "units".
> > > Adding "features" just because "enterpise-class dev platforms" have
> them
> > > is more marketing move, than actual technical need.
> > >
> >
>
In our previous episode, Fabr?cio Srdic said:
> > used in Java and .NET as either languages don't have "units".
> > Adding "features" just because "enterpise-class dev platforms" have them
> > is more marketing move, than actual technical need.
> >
>
> We can't nest units to form a hierarchical co
Am 27.10.2013 02:12 schrieb "Xiangrong Fang" :
> Also,
>
> I don't understand why this does not work:
>
> f := TFileStream.Create;
>
> I know that TFileStream's Create require a file name parameter, but as
TFileStream is inherited from TObject, which has a Create without
parameter. This is why I
Am 27.10.2013 12:18 schrieb "Michael Van Canneyt" :
>> Also,
>> I don't understand why this does not work:
>>
>> f := TFileStream.Create;
>>
>> I know that TFileStream's Create require a file name parameter, but as
TFileStream is inherited from TObject, which has a Create without
parameter. This
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
2013/10/25 Michael Van Canneyt
Why not simply make it a procedure that is called by ver-2 and ver-3.
If it cannot be called directly from external code, and will called only from
inside a visible consructor, there is simply no reason to make
15 matches
Mail list logo
