2013/9/26 Xiangrong Fang
>
> Which output:
>
> TIntTree
> TIntTree.TTree$LongInt
>
>
Forgot to ask, I understand that TTree$LongInt is the name the compiler
gave to the generic class when it is specialized, but what is
TIntTree.TTree$LongInt? What is the meaning of "Scoped" type (or type with
"n
Am 25.09.2013 13:05 schrieb "Lukasz Sokol" :
> Please let me know your thoughts :)
I personally would prefer if such protocol implementations are independant
of the socket classes used so I can use it with FPC's sockets, lNet,
Synapse or whatever.
Basically this would need a abstract class which
Hi All,
I have the following program:
1 program test;
2 {$mode objfpc}{$H+}
3 uses tree;
4 type
5 TIntTree = class(specialize TTree)
6 public
7 function Clone: TIntTree;
8 end;
9 function TIntTree.Clone: TIntTree;
10 begin
11 Result := TIntTree(inherited Clone);
1
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> CalDAV itself is used on the CRM I use, but I've no demand for interacting
> with it. Yet.*
I have just taken a look at the RFC* and it seems simple to implement.
I don't need CardDav right now, but I believe I will need it soon.
Can you t
Thank you for applying the patch, Michael.
As soon as I have some time I will send another one related to the same case.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> since I have not found anything on CardDAV related
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
Hello,
since I have not found anything on CardDAV related/written in/for
FreePascal/Lazarus,
(haven't googled with Delphi keyword thou)
I'd like to send out some smoke signals, asking which way would the
support for this kind of interaction (dare not
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, silvioprog wrote:
2013/9/24 Graeme Geldenhuys
On 24/09/13 10:46, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> I am working on it.
Thanks Michael.
btw: The fcl-web (and all your guidance) has worked wonders with my
client side CGI application. The organisation of cod
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Daniel Gaspary wrote:
> I was talking about the dom/laz2_dom feedback.
I was talking about the dom/laz2_dom DEVELOPERS feedback.
(Just Correcting myself)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
>>
>> By the way, feedback (is a viable suggestion, no, why..?) on this
>> subject would be appreciated.
>
> Of course I will give feedback when (and if) I get any.
I was talking about the dom/laz2_dom feedback.
But your feedback will be welc
Hello,
Can you help me to fix this issue?:
https://github.com/remobjects/pascalscript/issues/61
Thank you!
--
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal
My 2 cents on the "backwards compatibility" discussion.
First: backwards compatibility must be broken if the old
implementation is wrong. This seems obvious, but I have had
discussions about that in the past when I corrected another conversion
routine in fpc.
Wether or not the current implenetatio
On 25/09/13 16:00, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> On 25/09/2013 16:45, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
>> On 25/09/13 14:56, Daniel Gaspary wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Lukasz Sokol
>>>
>>> wrote:
>> For now, I was merely asking, what direction the development should
>> take, and whether it's a go
On 25/09/2013 16:45, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> On 25/09/13 14:56, Daniel Gaspary wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Lukasz Sokol
>> wrote:
> For now, I was merely asking, what direction the development should take,
> and whether it's a good idea to make it into a Data Access palette component
On 25/09/13 14:56, Daniel Gaspary wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
>> Seems like the more complicated elements of DOM level 3 will need DOM.pas
>> modifications too.
>
> What kind of modification ?
>
Uh, you got me - I don't know as I haven't started yet...
I was me
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> Seems like the more complicated elements of DOM level 3 will need DOM.pas
> modifications too.
What kind of modification ?
I have sent this patch [1] to allow create custom descendants of
TDomElement. You can check whether this could be use
2013/9/24 Graeme Geldenhuys
> On 24/09/13 10:46, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >
> > I am working on it.
>
> Thanks Michael.
>
> btw: The fcl-web (and all your guidance) has worked wonders with my
> client side CGI application. The organisation of code and application
> flow is so much better. Tha
Hello,
since I have not found anything on CardDAV related/written in/for
FreePascal/Lazarus,
(haven't googled with Delphi keyword thou)
I'd like to send out some smoke signals, asking which way would the
support for this kind of interaction (dare not call it a protocol)
would be best fitting int
On 24/09/13 12:26, Guillermo Martínez wrote:
> Sorry, Philippe, but I can't read your messages. :(
Have you tried a different email client? Mozilla Thunderbird seems to
read his messages just fine.
But I know what you mean. I have a very simple web interface for
newsgroups. And sometimes certain
On 24/09/13 10:46, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> I am working on it.
Thanks Michael.
btw: The fcl-web (and all your guidance) has worked wonders with my
client side CGI application. The organisation of code and application
flow is so much better. Thanks again for all your patience and help.
19 matches
Mail list logo
