> Am 24.07.2013 09:07, schrieb Carsten Bager:
> > The {$LONGSTRINGS OFF} directive is given at the beginning of the program,
> > and that
> > eliminates any problems with "long strings" using the 2.05 compiler. That
> > does not seem to
> > work with the new compiler.
> >
> > Is there a way ar
On 8/20/2013 23:16, waldo kitty wrote:
the first thing is what errors? "we" do appreciate your confidence in our
telepathic and remote viewing abilities but some things just cannot be handled
in either of these manners ;)
damned fingers... i didn't get a chance to add the requisite "[humor]" ta
On 8/20/2013 17:11, David Emerson wrote:
I am trying to compile some of the aggpas examples included with lazarus, but I
am getting errors upon errors.
the first thing is what errors? "we" do appreciate your confidence in our
telepathic and remote viewing abilities but some things just cannot
I have also tried compiling examples against the aggpas sources as
downloaded from the aggpas website, outside lazarus, and again, errors
and more errors.
Start by naming one error.
Thanks very much for your encouragement Matthias!
I managed to resolve everything by moving the $include agg_mo
On 08/20/2013 04:11 PM, David Emerson wrote:
I am trying to compile some of the aggpas examples included with
lazarus, but I am getting errors upon errors.
I have also tried compiling examples against the aggpas sources as
downloaded from the aggpas website, outside lazarus, and again, errors
an
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:11:31 -0700
David Emerson wrote:
> I am trying to compile some of the aggpas examples included with
> lazarus, but I am getting errors upon errors.
>
> I have also tried compiling examples against the aggpas sources as
> downloaded from the aggpas website, outside lazaru
I am trying to compile some of the aggpas examples included with
lazarus, but I am getting errors upon errors.
I have also tried compiling examples against the aggpas sources as
downloaded from the aggpas website, outside lazarus, and again, errors
and more errors.
Is there a recommended way
On 20.08.2013 15:39, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
1) I didn't notice that my question are related to "modes" of fpc, i.e.
turbo-pascal/delphi/objfpc.If they are different, I would like to
know more details, and I am more interested in objfpc mode, not those
"compatibility" modes.
It has nothing t
On 20/08/2013 17:09, Osvaldo Filho wrote:
> How can i get version 2.6.3 with svn?
>
> Is this in: http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/fixes_2_6 ?
Yes, that looks good.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.free
How can i get version 2.6.3 with svn?
Is this in: http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/fixes_2_6 ?
Thanks.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Hi Sven,
Thank you for comment :) I am interested in a high level description of
how these concepts (virtual / reintroduce / overloading) differs and how
they affect programming, and I am currently not running into trouble, just
try to get a better understanding of the language.
I'll explain my
On 20 Aug 2013, at 14:38, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 20.08.2013 13:22 schrieb "Osvaldo Filho" :
"a check", please, what check?
An if-clause inside the compiler was added by the revision mentioned
by
Flávio which now results in that internalerror.
Did you try to completely rebuild all packages
Am 20.08.2013 14:39 schrieb "Antonio Fortuny" :
>
>
> Le 20/08/2013 14:34, Sven Barth a écrit :
>>
>> >>
>> >> This is not same as the description in:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refsu26.html
>> >>
>> >> BTW, the above documents are talking about objects, but I am using
classes, is ther
Le 20/08/2013 14:34, Sven Barth a
écrit :
>>
>> This is not same as the description in: http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refsu26.html
>>
>> BTW, the above documents are talking about objects, but
I am using classes, is the
Am 20.08.2013 13:22 schrieb "Osvaldo Filho" :
>
> "a check", please, what check?
An if-clause inside the compiler was added by the revision mentioned by
Flávio which now results in that internalerror.
Did you try to completely rebuild all packages with the updated 2.7.1
compiler?
Regards,
Sven
_
Am 20.08.2013 09:36 schrieb "Antonio Fortuny" :
>
>
> Le 20/08/2013 07:34, Xiangrong Fang a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Flavio,
>>
>> Your findings confirmed mine, but not telling me why? It seems that the
"virtual" keyword has no use at all! To confirm this, I just removed the
"inherited" call in TDerived,
"a check", please, what check?
2013/8/20 Flávio Etrusco
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Osvaldo Filho
> wrote:
> > Anyone coud help-me?
> >
> > user1@movotcf:~/Documentos/Desenvolvimento/pascal/svn/ex/lazarus1010$
> make
> > bigide
> > make -C packager/registration
> > make[1]: Entrando no
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
> Hi Flavio,
>
> Your findings confirmed mine, but not telling me why?
I don't know why, maybe FPC used to be more strict about the use of
inherited, or the docs are simply wrong.
> It seems that the "virtual" keyword has no use at all!
It
Le 20/08/2013 07:34, Xiangrong Fang a
écrit :
Hi Flavio,
Your findings confirmed mine, but not telling me why? It
seems that the "virtual" keyword has no use at all! To
confirm this, I just removed the
19 matches
Mail list logo
