On Mon, 5 Aug 2013, silvioprog wrote:
Hello,
I'm using FPC 2.6.2 and it doesn't supports PUT method. So, FPC from trunk
supports PUT?
Yes. And Delete, HEAD, in fact all methods.
Michael.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.or
Hello,
I'm using FPC 2.6.2 and it doesn't supports PUT method. So, FPC from trunk
supports PUT?
Thank you!
--
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.
Am 05.08.2013 09:58 schrieb "Michael Schnell" :
>
> On 08/04/2013 05:39 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>>
>> At least the nightly test suite results for MIPSel range from around 20
to around 60 failures which puts the target into a quite common area of
other targets
>
>
> That does sound promising ?
>
I th
On 04/08/2013 17:39, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 04.08.2013 16:52, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> At least the nightly test suite results for MIPSel range from around 20
> to around 60 failures which puts the target into a quite common area of
> other targets (the main targets like i386 often have less t
On 05/08/2013 09:58, Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 08/04/2013 05:39 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>> At least the nightly test suite results for MIPSel range from around
>> 20 to around 60 failures which puts the target into a quite common
>> area of other targets
>
> That does sound promising ?
>
> BTW.:
On 08/04/2013 05:39 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
At least the nightly test suite results for MIPSel range from around
20 to around 60 failures which puts the target into a quite common
area of other targets
That does sound promising ?
BTW.: is Zero such errors a requirement for a release version ?
On 08/04/2013 04:52 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
1. if people are using the mipsel code already/how suitable it is for
console (non-db, perhaps network) programs
On the long run, in fact I am considering to do an embedded project with
PIC32 (which is a MIPS CPU), and here there will be no forma
