User programmer can add it to Tobject via object helpers, at least in Delphi,
so my answer to this question would be: no.
From: vfclists .
Sent: Thursday, 11 July 2013 22:22
To: Lazarus mailing list ; FPC developers' list ; FPC-Pascal users discussions
Subject: [fpc-devel] Should TObject or TCo
On 2013-07-11 22:35, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> Why not use 2.6.2? It is free. No update fee, full version, with source.
I think maybe he is getting confused with FPC and Lazarus versions.
Maybe he is referring to Lazarus 1.0.6 release?
Regards,
- Graeme -
_
On 2013-07-11 20:20, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
> Is it so hard to google "fpc jvm language limitations" ?
Yes, especially if your internet has been down for 3/4 of the day [2
days in a row].
G.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepasca
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:07:05 +0100
"vfclists ." wrote:
> This attitude which exists in the Pascal community needs to end.
Not really.
R.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 11 July 2013 23:07, Benito van der Zander wrote:
> Annotations like in Java would be nice...
>
>
> On 07/11/2013 10:22 PM, vfclists . wrote:
>
> Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?
>
> I think they should. One for the design itself and one for describing the
> usage at de
Older versions are never free of bugs (that's one of the reason why the next
version appears), and even worse, it looks like there's no trace of bug
reports for version as old as 1.0.6 (>10 years). Just try everything
yourself, and if something is wrong, feel free to fix yourself (the source
is ope
I have a reason why i need version 1.0.6(it is not personal reason I
shouldnt write here about it) thats why I want to know if it is stable(all
parts compiler, ide, debugger, ...)
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Mattias Gaertner <
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 22:14:0
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 22:14:09 +0200
Matúš Kudláč wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I want to use Free Pascal 1.0.6 in windows XP Professional 32bit. I
> know to ask some questions about that. Are there some stability problems
> with that version(compiler, IDE, debugger, ...)? If there are can I make
> some
Hi,
I want to use Free Pascal 1.0.6 in windows XP Professional 32bit. I
know to ask some questions about that. Are there some stability problems
with that version(compiler, IDE, debugger, ...)? If there are can I make
some changes to make it stable(for example to edit the properties of the
sh
> One for the design itself and one for describing the usage at design or
runtime.
Why put the burden on code? Something like this is the programmer's
responsibility, no need to add more bloat to the final code. What the
program doesn't use or the user doesn't see should never be in the
executable
Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?
I think they should. One for the design itself and one for describing the
usage at design or runtime.
Smalltalk has it.
Consider it a version of the Hint property but for the developer
--
Frank Church
===
http://devblog
Am 11.07.2013 15:07, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> On 2013-07-11 11:34, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>>
>> Has that person read this:
>> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/FPC_JVM/Language
>
>
> Wow, things are really hard to find in the wiki.
>
> * No link to that page mentioned, from it's parent
On 11-7-2013 3:07, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2013-07-11 11:34, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>>
>> Has that person read this:
>> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/FPC_JVM/Language
>
>
> Wow, things are really hard to find in the wiki.
Searching the wiki for JVM worked just fine for me... Simila
On 7/11/2013 09:07, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Wow, things are really hard to find in the wiki.
this is true for all wikis... i've never found one that wasn't hard to get
around on...
i like the "what links here" links but have never seen a "this links where" one
that shows the other pages th
On 11 Jul 2013, at 15:07, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2013-07-11 11:34, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>>
>> Has that person read this:
>> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/FPC_JVM/Language
>
>
> Wow, things are really hard to find in the wiki.
>
> * No link to that page mentioned, from it's pa
On 2013-07-11 11:34, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>
> Has that person read this:
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/FPC_JVM/Language
Wow, things are really hard to find in the wiki.
* No link to that page mentioned, from it's parent page
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/FPC_JVM
* No ment
On 2013-07-11 11:34, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>
> Has that person read this:
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/FPC_JVM/Language
Thanks, I'll pass that on.
Graeme.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepa
On 10/07/2013 13:38, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2013-07-10 11:19, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>>
>> Sure, but you can't select just any True Type fonts for console windows
>> (only Lucida is offered in WinXP;
>
> And is so since Win95. Just amazing that Windows Console is so far
> behind other platforms
On 11-7-2013 10:37, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> When using FPC's JVM backend... does that cause language restrictions?
> eg: limiting the usage of unsigned numbers and pointers when targeting
> the JVM?
Has that person read this:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/FPC_JVM/Language
?
Groete,
Reinie
Hi,
[I was asked this by somebody else]
When using FPC's JVM backend... does that cause language restrictions?
eg: limiting the usage of unsigned numbers and pointers when targeting
the JVM?
Regards,
Graeme.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lis
On 2013-07-10 11:19, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>
> Sure, but you can't select just any True Type fonts for console windows
> (only Lucida is offered in WinXP;
And is so since Win95. Just amazing that Windows Console is so far
behind other platforms - it's rather ridiculous if you think about it.
If I u
21 matches
Mail list logo
