Thomas Schatzl wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 18:48 +0200, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Op 29-05-13 18:16, Thomas Schatzl schreef:
There's snapshot on the ftp.
Downloaded ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v27/arm-linux-armhf/
Should I do this "native" ?
Copied the contents to /usr
Tried fpc
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 18:48 +0200, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
> Op 29-05-13 18:16, Thomas Schatzl schreef:
> >
> > There's snapshot on the ftp.
> Downloaded ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v27/arm-linux-armhf/
>
> >
> >> Should I do this "native" ?
> >
> Copied the contents to /usr
> Tried f
Op 29-05-13 18:16, Thomas Schatzl schreef:
There's snapshot on the ftp.
Downloaded ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v27/arm-linux-armhf/
Should I do this "native" ?
Copied the contents to /usr
Tried fpc -i, shows fpc 2.6.2, for armel.
Is there some mistake ?
Since it seems pos
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 14:01 +0200, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
> Op 27-05-13 21:20, Koenraad Lelong schreef:
> > Hi,
> >
> ..
>
> A suggestion on the hardkernel-forum said it might be an armhf problem.
> Is it prossible to compile fpc from armhf ?
There's snapshot on the ftp.
> Should I do this
Op 27-05-13 21:20, Koenraad Lelong schreef:
Hi,
..
A suggestion on the hardkernel-forum said it might be an armhf problem.
Is it prossible to compile fpc from armhf ? Should I do this "native" ?
I mean, I have an fpc running on the hardware, but it's an armel, at
least I think it is. My ppca
> > It's perfectly normal that both files are not generated. Why do you
> > expect those files there?
> Because they were there before ;) (running make distclean with options
> 2x, make all, make install).
> I've worked around the fpdoc thing, haven't looked at Linux yet. I'll do
> a make install t
