Re: [fpc-pascal] systemh.inc(117, 16) Error: Duplicate identifier "FarPointer"

2013-05-06 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 07 May 2013, at 08:21, Eric Kom wrote: > Thanks for the respond! > but without option OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK is set, another error occurred: > > erickom@cloudTwo:~/freePascal27/fpc$ make NOGDB=1 OPT='-O- -gl -Xs-' all > Makefile:2704: *** The only supported starting compiler version is 2.6.0. Y

Re: [fpc-pascal] Win64 release of FPC 2.6.2 missing

2013-05-06 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 06 May 2013, at 18:40, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > On 2013-05-06 08:32, Jonas Maebe wrote: >> >> The whole point is that the "typical end user" doesn't know nor should >> have to care about whether the compiler is a 32 or 64 bit binary. It >> should not make any difference whatsoever. > >

Re: [fpc-pascal] systemh.inc(117, 16) Error: Duplicate identifier "FarPointer"

2013-05-06 Thread Eric Kom
On 07/05/2013 07:49, Sven Barth wrote: Am 07.05.2013 07:41 schrieb "Eric Kom" >: > svn up > make clean > make OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1 NOGDB=1 OPT='-O- -gl -Xs-' all As written by Jonas already: don't ask for support if the option OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK

Re: [fpc-pascal] Win64 release of FPC 2.6.2 missing

2013-05-06 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2013-05-06 08:32, Jonas Maebe wrote: > > The whole point is that the "typical end user" doesn't know nor should > have to care about whether the compiler is a 32 or 64 bit binary. It > should not make any difference whatsoever. How does the saying go: "I want to live in Theory, because eve

Re: [fpc-pascal] systemh.inc(117, 16) Error: Duplicate identifier "FarPointer"

2013-05-06 Thread Sven Barth
Am 07.05.2013 07:41 schrieb "Eric Kom" : > svn up > make clean > make OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1 NOGDB=1 OPT='-O- -gl -Xs-' all As written by Jonas already: don't ask for support if the option OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK is set. It is there for a reason. Regards, Sven ___

[fpc-pascal] systemh.inc(117, 16) Error: Duplicate identifier "FarPointer"

2013-05-06 Thread Eric Kom
Good day, Compile failed. Please see below the error/bug. svn up make clean make OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1 NOGDB=1 OPT='-O- -gl -Xs-' all /bin/mkdir -p /home/erickom/freePascal27/fpc/rtl/units/i386-linux /usr/local/lib/fpc/2.7.1/ppc386 -Ur -Ur -Xs -O2 -n -F

Re: [fpc-pascal] Win64 release of FPC 2.6.2 missing

2013-05-06 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 06 May 2013, at 21:15, Andrew Brunner wrote: > On May 6, 2013, at 2:32 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote: > >> >> On 04 May 2013, at 16:24, Andrew Brunner wrote: >> >>> I agree that most of us first go to x64 downloads for binaries. Thinking >>> 32 to 64 or reverse is onerous on typical end users. >

Re: [fpc-pascal] How to close TInetServer without except?

2013-05-06 Thread silvioprog
2013/5/6 Zaher Dirkey > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Ludo Brands wrote: > >> Watch out for Synchronize(@DoReceive) in a recv loop. That is going to >> drag down your performance considerably. >> > > Maybe you do need to call synh, leave it to the user to add it in his > event, or make it as a

Re: [fpc-pascal] How to close TInetServer without except?

2013-05-06 Thread silvioprog
2013/5/6 Ludo Brands > In TTcpIpClientSocketThread.Execute you do a read followed by a select. > The logic is: first select then read when something is available. > Sorry, but I don't understand well this part. :/ In the old code I not used select, and now I'm using it just to know that recv rec

Re: [fpc-pascal] Win64 release of FPC 2.6.2 missing

2013-05-06 Thread Andrew Brunner
I agree with what you are saying as long as the os matches the binary type. An x64 native package must install a x64bit binary and utils. I would be understating if I said that a 32bit binary would be normal on a 64bit distro. Andrew Brunner Aurawin LLC 512.574.6298 A safe new way to sto

Re: [fpc-pascal] How to close TInetServer without except?

2013-05-06 Thread Zaher Dirkey
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Ludo Brands wrote: > Watch out for Synchronize(@DoReceive) in a recv loop. That is going to > drag down your performance considerably. > ​Maybe you do need to call synh, leave it to the user to add it in his event, or make it as an option. For that i hate using c

Re: [fpc-pascal] How to close TInetServer without except?

2013-05-06 Thread Ludo Brands
On 05/06/2013 07:17 AM, silvioprog wrote: > > Ludo, I'm almost by completing the units in this link: > > https://bitbucket.org/silvioprog/tcpipcomp (this repository is temporary) > > The current code (I'm updating it daily) in these units is good? I'm > open to suggestions, and we can change wh

Re: [fpc-pascal] systemh.inc(117, 16) Error: Duplicate identifier "FarPointer"

2013-05-06 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 06 May 2013, at 07:50, Eric Kom wrote: Compile failed. Please see below the error/bug. svn up make clean make OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1 NOGDB=1 OPT='-O- -gl -Xs-' all Never ask for support when using OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1, it's guaranteed to break from time to time. It's the whole reason

[fpc-pascal] Re: [MacPascal] CoreFoundation Freepascal MAC OSX

2013-05-06 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 05 May 2013, at 06:20, m...@rpzdesign.com wrote: Anybody have any success with the included units for CoreFoundation on Mac OSX. I was trying to use CFSetGetCount( ) function call, it is clearly defined in CFSet.pas and yet the linker error is: Identifier Not Found "CFSetGetCount" Add

Re: [fpc-pascal] Win64 release of FPC 2.6.2 missing

2013-05-06 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 04 May 2013, at 16:24, Andrew Brunner wrote: I agree that most of us first go to x64 downloads for binaries. Thinking 32 to 64 or reverse is onerous on typical end users. The whole point is that the "typical end user" doesn't know nor should have to care about whether the compiler is a