2013/5/4 Ludo Brands
> On 05/03/2013 05:57 PM, silvioprog wrote:
> > Could you give me an example in practice? Theoretically I understand,
> > but I don't know do in practice. :/
> >
> > Now, TTcpIpServer is working well. The new problem is: when I close the
> > server with one or more clients co
On 05/03/2013 05:57 PM, silvioprog wrote:
>
> Could you give me an example in practice? Theoretically I understand,
> but I don't know do in practice. :/
>
> Now, TTcpIpServer is working well. The new problem is: when I close the
> server with one or more clients connected, I got a memory leak.
Hello,
I'm trying to detect if a project is a simple program or a application.
Please download a small test here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/w6a9gb4b9hnjit5/prova.zip
On Windows it works fine, but on Linux not.
--
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
On 03 May 2013, at 22:56, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> That's the point. Don't. Use a select, it has a timeout, and accept only if
> select shows activity on the listened to socket
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
>>
>> That's the point. Don't. Use a select, it has a timeout, and accept only
>> if
>> select shows activity on the listened to socket.
>
>
> Not sure, but i believe i used it in
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> That's the point. Don't. Use a select, it has a timeout, and accept only if
> select shows activity on the listened to socket.
Not sure, but i believe i used it in the past and have problems with it,
We can leave it to silvio to te
On 03 May 2013, at 20:13, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Ewald said:
>>
>> The point being that the answer to one of the OP sub-problems [the one
>> quoted _partially_ above], can be to either use:
>> - pthread_cancel() [overkill, I know, but nonetheless a solution]
>> - no
In our previous episode, Zaher Dirkey said:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> > Select on the main socket before doing the accept?
>
>
> ?No i am not use Select before Accept, accept is blocking the thread.
That's the point. Don't. Use a select, it has a timeout,
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> Select on the main socket before doing the accept?
No i am not use Select before Accept, accept is blocking the thread.
Best Regards
Zaher Dirkey
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@list
Fixed all errors:
https://bitbucket.org/silvioprog/tcpipcomp/src/273b28b52b30621ffb4955e1136f8a06c160d20a/src/tcpipserver.pas?at=master
I'll test this class severely.
--
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
___
fpc-pascal maillist
In our previous episode, Ewald said:
>
> The point being that the answer to one of the OP sub-problems [the one
> quoted _partially_ above], can be to either use:
> - pthread_cancel() [overkill, I know, but nonetheless a solution]
> - non-blocking sockets [not very code-efficient IMHO if you only
Once upon a time, Zaher Dirkey said:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Ewald wrote:
>
>> "Accept" but without errors
>
> You cant, Accept give you a handle of new socket or give you an error, not
> all is fatal error, just check what is it, if it a closed handle or
> shutdown.
Yes, I know that.
2013/5/3 Zaher Dirkey
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:57 PM, silvioprog wrote:
>
>> when I close the server with one or more clients connected, I got a
>> memory leak.
>
>
> Check if the thread freed?
> Try to stop server manually (by button or in Close event in the form)
>
> Best Regards
> Zaher D
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Ewald wrote:
> "Accept" but without errors
You cant, Accept give you a handle of new socket or give you an error, not
all is fatal error, just check what is it, if it a closed handle or
shutdown.
Best Regards
Zaher Dirkey
__
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:57 PM, silvioprog wrote:
> when I close the server with one or more clients connected, I got a memory
> leak.
Check if the thread freed?
Try to stop server manually (by button or in Close event in the form)
Best Regards
Zaher Dirkey
On 03 May 2013, at 11:30, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Ewald wrote:
> That's true, but at least it returns control to you (= the programmer), so
> you can close the handles manually.
>
> I am notprefer force to close any thing, that will make more bugs in your
>
2013/5/3 Ludo Brands
> On 05/02/2013 10:00 PM, silvioprog wrote:
> >
> > Lines 277 and 278. That is, I already do that. The problem now is how to
> > stop the "Accept" but without errors.
> >
> > I implemented the "Stop" method in socket, but I did not want to do it
> > this ugly way.
> >
>
> Sam
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Ewald wrote:
> That's true, but at least it returns control to you (= the programmer), so
> you can close the handles manually.
I am notprefer force to close any thing, that will make more bugs in your
application, while it is work fine with other programmesr
On 03 May 2013, at 00:15, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Ewald wrote:
> pthread_cancel()
>
> pthread_cancel() not close the handles i though.
That's true, but at least it returns control to you (= the programmer), so you
can close the handles manually.
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
