Re: [fpc-pascal] State of fcl-stl generics lib

2013-01-11 Thread Florian Klämpfl
Am 11.01.2013 11:19, schrieb Juha Manninen: > > For example, if someone is developing a competing generics library, > could he be advised to improve fcl-stl instead? Definitively. > Would patches be accepted? Yes. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pa

Re: [fpc-pascal] State of fcl-stl generics lib

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Juha Manninen wrote: I remember seeing discussion about fcl-stl saying that it would still need improvement but nobody is actively working on it. I just couldn't find the thread about it now. So, what is the current state? Sorry I have not studied the lib myself yet (long

Re: [fpc-pascal] State of fcl-stl generics lib

2013-01-11 Thread Sven Barth
Am 11.01.2013 11:19, schrieb Juha Manninen: I remember seeing discussion about fcl-stl saying that it would still need improvement but nobody is actively working on it. I just couldn't find the thread about it now. So, what is the current state? Sorry I have not studied the lib myself yet (long T

[fpc-pascal] State of fcl-stl generics lib

2013-01-11 Thread Juha Manninen
I remember seeing discussion about fcl-stl saying that it would still need improvement but nobody is actively working on it. I just couldn't find the thread about it now. So, what is the current state? Sorry I have not studied the lib myself yet (long ToDo list). For example, if someone is develop