On 06/01/13 12:04, Bart wrote:
On 1/6/13, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
For the illeterate that I am, thich raises yet another dumb question:
64-bit CPU's don't have 64-bit registers?
Try with a compiler for a 64 bit compiler.
Okay, now I am feeling realy stupid and embarassed.
Shame on me.
Bart
_
> In other words, if the number of elements on both sides of the expression
is the same you get a one-to-one correspondence but if the RHS only has a
single element it's expanded.
That's what I want to avoid because I love Pascal strictness :)
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pas
leledumbo wrote:
If Pascal /had/ to have some sort of multiple assignment, I'd have
thought borrowing an idea from Perl and doing something like
[a, b, c] := (d = e);
would have been minimally acceptable.
I would pick from Lua instead, it looks cleaner. Well... I'll make it
stricter though
> If Pascal /had/ to have some sort of multiple assignment, I'd have
thought borrowing an idea from Perl and doing something like
[a, b, c] := (d = e);
would have been minimally acceptable.
I would pick from Lua instead, it looks cleaner. Well... I'll make it
stricter though, by making the n
