Am 22.10.2012 15:36, schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
>>
>> That's why I'm saying only official FPC releases will be supported in
>> the PPU versions of my components. If they want to use FPC 2.6.x (fixes
>> branch) or FPC 2.7.1, then they must buy the source code version of my
>> components.
>
On 2012-10-22 15:36, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> Another potential caveat is that many distro systems allow to apply distro
> specific patches over DIST sources.
In that case they will have to use the FPC official 2.6.0 binary
release, or purchase the source code version (recommended for obvious
r
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> > I think it would work in principle. Package built systems are harder though,
> > one doesn't know if they are built with -Ur.
>
> Just like my answer to Michael. Isn't -Ur a default compiler parameter
> set in the Makefiles?
It seems it is now,
On 2012-10-22 15:00, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> DevArt uses this approach for their data access components (see here at...
Thanks for the info.
> problems. It might (!) get more messy though if you need to use units
> distributed with Lazarus (e.g. "Controls", "Graphics", etc.), though it
> could
On 22/10/12 3:17, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2012-10-22 14:59, Vincent Snijders wrote:
I am more optimistic than Michael. Because the same source is used,
the CRC is the same and no recompile is done.
Thanks Vincent, things are looking better and better.
You might be interested to follow
On 2012-10-22 14:59, Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
> I am more optimistic than Michael. Because the same source is used,
> the CRC is the same and no recompile is done.
Thanks Vincent, things are looking better and better.
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpc
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Vincent Snijders wrote:
2012/10/22 :
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Vincent Snijders wrote:
I am more optimistic than Michael. Because the same source is used,
the CRC is the same and no recompile is done.
It also depends on the date of the .ppu ?
I don't think so. But I
2012/10/22 :
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
>> I am more optimistic than Michael. Because the same source is used,
>> the CRC is the same and no recompile is done.
>
>
> It also depends on the date of the .ppu ?
I don't think so. But I don't mind to be proven otherwise.
Vin
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Vincent Snijders wrote:
2012/10/22 Graeme Geldenhuys :
On 2012-10-22 14:36, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I am not sure whether they use the binary release of fpc, or if they compile
their own for e.g. windows. If it is the latter, you're in problems.
Anybody fro
Am 22.10.2012 15:45, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
I have doubts this is all worthwhile. Compared to delphi, versions and
targets significalty increase, thus support burden increases
From my experience it seems that if you do production work, stick to
officially released FPC versions only. I hav
2012/10/22 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> On 2012-10-22 14:36, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
>>
>> I am not sure whether they use the binary release of fpc, or if they compile
>> their own for e.g. windows. If it is the latter, you're in problems.
>
>
> Anybody from the Lazarus development team that can
On 2012-10-22 14:36, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
>
> I am not sure whether they use the binary release of fpc, or if they compile
> their own for e.g. windows. If it is the latter, you're in problems.
Anybody from the Lazarus development team that can comment here?
> IMHO, in the end it
On 2012-10-22 14:25, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> (and one set per target)
Correct.
> I've been thinking about this, since the discussion with the TMS grid guy
> (Bruno F.) on the Lazarus Day. He was interested because of trial versions
> btw, rather than cheap licenses.
Yes, I'm thinking of
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2012-10-22 14:15, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
That will most probably not work, although maybe -Ur may provide a solution.
Isn't -Ur a default compiler option in official releases? So a 'make
all' in the FPC 2.6.0 source directory sho
On 2012-10-22 14:15, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
>
> That will most probably not work, although maybe -Ur may provide a solution.
Isn't -Ur a default compiler option in official releases? So a 'make
all' in the FPC 2.6.0 source directory should use the same compiler
options on every Linux
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> Could this work with FPC too? Can I release commercial components as PPU
> files for say FPC 2.6.0 (knowing that those PPU's will not work with
> any other version of FPC).
(and one set per target)
> The only supported compilers will be the offi
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
Many Delphi components are sold as "full source code", or slightly
cheaper (or as trial) as compiled *.DCU files for a specific Delphi version.
Could this work with FPC too? Can I release commercial components as PPU
files for say FPC 2.6.0
Hi,
Many Delphi components are sold as "full source code", or slightly
cheaper (or as trial) as compiled *.DCU files for a specific Delphi version.
Could this work with FPC too? Can I release commercial components as PPU
files for say FPC 2.6.0 (knowing that those PPU's will not work with
any ot
18 matches
Mail list logo
