Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: problems compiling FPC

2012-10-18 Thread Mattias Gaertner
Marco van de Voort hat am 18. Oktober 2012 um 13:41 geschrieben: > In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said: > > > I disagree. To prevent any strange side-effects (undefined behaviour), > > > the version check should happen as early as possible - before any > > > compiling commences. > > >

[fpc-pascal] New FPCUnit db results writer: testdbwriter: request for... testing

2012-10-18 Thread Reinier Olislagers
Hi list, I've been working on a listener for FPCUnit that writes test results to a database. I intend to use it to run e.g. database tests on my Jenkins CI server whenever a new build is done. Therefore, the db is quite normalized in order to limit used space. I've included a flattening view that

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: problems compiling FPC

2012-10-18 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said: > > I disagree. To prevent any strange side-effects (undefined behaviour), > > the version check should happen as early as possible - before any > > compiling commences. > > I'm compiling fpc trunk with trunk/fixes/release since years. It works more

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: problems compiling FPC

2012-10-18 Thread Mattias Gaertner
Graeme Geldenhuys hat am 17. Oktober 2012 um 17:05 geschrieben: > On 2012-10-17 15:57, Vincent Snijders wrote: > > > > Alternatively, it could just be a warning. Then if it fails later, the > > complete output will show the reason. > > > I disagree. To prevent any strange side-effects (undefined