On 6-9-2012 18:17, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 06.09.2012 18:09, schrieb Reinier Olislagers:
>> On 6-9-2012 17:04, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>>> Am 06.09.2012 14:59, schrieb Reinier Olislagers:
>>> Only with a non 2.6.0 starting compiler :) E.g. an older 2.7.1 compiler
>>> using a newer 2.7.1 rtl.
>>
Am 06.09.2012 18:09, schrieb Reinier Olislagers:
> On 6-9-2012 17:04, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>> Am 06.09.2012 14:59, schrieb Reinier Olislagers:
>>> I've been having errors compiling FPC trunk x64 on Windows with fpcup
>>> for a while now.
>>>
>
>>> Does anybody else see this?
>>
>> Only with a no
On 6-9-2012 17:04, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 06.09.2012 14:59, schrieb Reinier Olislagers:
>> I've been having errors compiling FPC trunk x64 on Windows with fpcup
>> for a while now.
>>
>> Does anybody else see this?
>
> Only with a non 2.6.0 starting compiler :) E.g. an older 2.7.1 compiler
>
Am 06.09.2012 17:34, schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
> Got the ARM crosscompiler under Linux running.
> Thanks to Jeppe Johansen!
>
> Before it runs I deleted some of the CPUARM_HAS_BLX,CPUARM_HAS_BLX_LABEL
> identifiers below. Because the linker gaves warnings/errors. As I understand
> does the thumb
Got the ARM crosscompiler under Linux running.
Thanks to Jeppe Johansen!
Before it runs I deleted some of the CPUARM_HAS_BLX,CPUARM_HAS_BLX_LABEL
identifiers below. Because the linker gaves warnings/errors. As I understand
does the thumb2 mode not support this mnemonics.
Is it possible to set
f
Am 06.09.2012 14:59, schrieb Reinier Olislagers:
> I've been having errors compiling FPC trunk x64 on Windows with fpcup
> for a while now.
>
> Current output (rev 22336)
> C:/development/fpcbootstrap64/ppcx64.exe -Ur -Xs -O2 -n -Fi../inc
> -Fi../x86_64 -FE. -FUC:/development/fpctrunk/rtl/units/x8
I've been having errors compiling FPC trunk x64 on Windows with fpcup
for a while now.
Current output (rev 22336)
C:/development/fpcbootstrap64/ppcx64.exe -Ur -Xs -O2 -n -Fi../inc
-Fi../x86_64 -FE. -FUC:/development/fpctrunk/rtl/units/x86_64-win64 -gw
-gl -dx86_64 -dRELEASE -Us -Sg system.pp -Fi
Am 06.09.2012 09:27, schrieb Carlo Kok:
> Op 6-9-2012 02:43, Martin schreef:
>> On 06/09/2012 01:28, Alexander Hofmann wrote:
>>> You were right of course! I could have sweared I looked over the
>>> differences of x86 and x64 numerous times, but.. .well.
>>>
>>> After some copy'n'paste it work's li
Op 6-9-2012 02:43, Martin schreef:
On 06/09/2012 01:28, Alexander Hofmann wrote:
You were right of course! I could have sweared I looked over the
differences of x86 and x64 numerous times, but.. .well.
After some copy'n'paste it work's like a charm. Seems The only
difference is in calling Virtu
