On 13 Jun 12, at 18:33, Victor Campillo wrote:
> El 11/06/2012 10:52, Victor Campillo escribió:
Hi,
> > I have a doubt about Basicevent and RTLevent, according to the
> > documentation Basicevent is obsolete and I should use RTLevent
> > instead. I use most of the time Rtlevent but now I need to
On 13/06/2012 14:12, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Antonio Fortuny wrote on Wed, 13 Jun 2012:
I can see the memory leak I have generated (read below) but no
refecence to the line itself. Instead I receive the reference lines
before and after the memory leak creation inside the rtl.
The reason is that
El 11/06/2012 10:52, Victor Campillo escribió:
Hi all,
I have a doubt about Basicevent and RTLevent, according to the
documentation Basicevent is obsolete and I should use RTLevent
instead. I use most of the time Rtlevent but now I need to know the
result of WaitFor (signaled, timeout, ect).
Antonio Fortuny wrote on Wed, 13 Jun 2012:
I can see the memory leak I have generated (read below) but no
refecence to the line itself. Instead I receive the reference lines
before and after the memory leak creation inside the rtl.
The reason is that the RTL itself is compiled with optimis
Hi folks.
I've got a serious prblem too with debugger and heaptrc.
It look like the one described by *Rainer Stratmann *posted last month.
My problem goes around the tracing of memory leaks.
I've been busy with Martin on the Lazarus mailing list and he couldn't
find why addresses were not follo
On Wed, June 13, 2012 12:55, alrieckert wrote:
> Tomas Hajny-2 wrote
>>
>> Sorry for a possibly stupid question, but is this offset
>> (conceptionally)
>> comparable to the -WB option used for some other targets? If so, it
>> might
>> make sense to extend it also for your case...
>>
>
> Hi Tomas,
>
Florian Klämpfl wrote
>
> Better submit a bug tracker entry. This way it cannot get lost.
>
Hi Florian,
Thank you, I do have an open bug on this issue here
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=22146 Freepascal Bug ID 22146
--
Regards
Anton Rieckert
--
View this message in context:
http://
On 13 June 2012 11:36, silvioprog wrote:
>
> With:
>
> {.$define UseMusic}
>
> I do not hear sound ... :/
I don't know what to say, other than It works here - with or
without the UseMusic define. And as I mentioned, we have a project
that uses SDL a lot, on Linux and Windows, and tested on m
Tomas Hajny-2 wrote
>
> Sorry for a possibly stupid question, but is this offset (conceptionally)
> comparable to the -WB option used for some other targets? If so, it might
> make sense to extend it also for your case...
>
Hi Tomas,
Not a stupid question at all. To be totally honest, I have n
Koenraad Lelong-2 wrote
>
> About that DFU-loader, do you have to do anything special to be able to
> use fpc, besides modifying your start-address ? Any links to read more
> about it ?
> Now I'm using jtag to flash and debug my software.
>
Hi Koenraad,
I'm using "DfuSe USB device firmware u
Am 13.06.2012 11:36 schrieb "Alexander Shishkin" :
>
> 12.06.2012 17:38, Xiangrong Fang пишет:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a std::map equivalent for free pascal?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shannon
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.fr
On 13 June 2012 04:26, silvioprog wrote:
>
> I tried playing a wav file with this demo in attached, no errors, but
> no sound came out. :(
You are releasing the TSoundEngine instance to quickly, and don't give
SDL chance to initialize fully and play the sound. Simply add a
sleep(1000) call [jus
12.06.2012 17:38, Xiangrong Fang пишет:
Hi,
Is there a std::map equivalent for free pascal?
Thanks,
Shannon
--
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
gmap.TMap from fcl
On 2012-06-12 15:38, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
Hi,
Is there a std::map equivalent for free pascal?
Thanks,
Shannon
If you wish to use generics you can try TFPGMap from the unit fgl.
It does about the same.
Kind regards,
Torsten Bonde Christiansen.
___
Hi,
Is there a std::map equivalent for free pascal?
Thanks,
Shannon
--
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 13-06-12 07:37, alrieckert wrote:
alrieckert wrote
Please just make sure about your starting address for the flash. I'm using
the STM32F103CBT6 and the start address is 0x0800 and not 0x080
I've just verified it. The starting address for the flash should be
0x0800. The reason
On Wed, June 13, 2012 07:37, alrieckert wrote:
> alrieckert wrote
>>
>> Please just make sure about your starting address for the flash. I'm
>> using
>> the STM32F103CBT6 and the start address is 0x0800 and not 0x080
>>
> I've just verified it. The starting address for the flash should be
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
