On 4 May 2012 23:03, Henry Vermaak wrote:
> On 4 May 2012 22:14, Guillermo Martínez Jiménez wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I'm working on a wrapper of a C library. I've found a bug, but I
>> can't debug it with GDB because if I compile with "-g" and link with
>> the debug version of the librar
On 4 May 2012 22:14, Guillermo Martínez Jiménez wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm working on a wrapper of a C library. I've found a bug, but I
> can't debug it with GDB because if I compile with "-g" and link with
> the debug version of the library it works correctly.
>
> But if I compile with "-
Hello everybody,
I'm working on a wrapper of a C library. I've found a bug, but I
can't debug it with GDB because if I compile with "-g" and link with
the debug version of the library it works correctly.
But if I compile with "-g" and link with the release version of the
library, I can't debug i
On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:22:16 +0200
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
>
>
> I'm creating a script to be executed by instantfpc when I noticed
> that paramstr(0) does not reflect the location of the script but the
> location of the cached executable. Is there a way to alter this location
> program
In our previous episode, Tomas Hajny said:
> 1) Find the first alphabetic character after the first line (which is
> already processed/skipped by InstantFPC anyway) while ignoring all
> whitespaces and possible comments (in all allowed formats, i.e. including
> (* *) ) - the only small complexity h
On Fri, May 4, 2012 18:44, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
> On May 4, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 17:44, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
>>> On 4 mei '12, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Fri, 4 May
>>> 2012, michael.vancann...@wisa.be [3]wrote:
> On Fri, 4
On May 4, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 17:44, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
>> On 4 mei '12, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 May
>> 2012, michael.vancann...@wisa.be [3]wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 4 May 2012,
>> dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl [1]wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 17:44, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
> On 4 mei '12, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 May
> 2012, michael.vancann...@wisa.be [3]wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 4 May 2012,
> dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl [1]wrote:
>>>
I'm creating a script to be
> executed by instantfpc wh
On 4 mei '12, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May
2012, michael.vancann...@wisa.be [3]wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 4 May 2012,
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl [1]wrote:
>>
>>> I'm creating a script to be
executed by instantfpc when I noticed that paramstr(0) does not reflect
the location of
On Fri, 4 May 2012, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2012, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
I'm creating a script to be executed by instantfpc when I noticed
that paramstr(0) does not reflect the location of the script but the
location of the cached executable. Is there a w
On Fri, 4 May 2012, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
I'm creating a script to be executed by instantfpc when I noticed
that paramstr(0) does not reflect the location of the script but the
location of the cached executable. Is there a way to alter this location
programatically to the script lo
I'm creating a script to be executed by instantfpc when I noticed
that paramstr(0) does not reflect the location of the script but the
location of the cached executable. Is there a way to alter this location
programatically to the script location? Is there an alternative way?
Regards, Darius
On 04-05-12 14:31, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
It might be good to compile with -Cparmv6 (or -Cparmv7, do not know what
type the processor you use is), this generates a "better" return
instruction ("bx lr") - and for the rbit instruction you need armv6
already.
Wouldn't it be possible to do
r
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 14:14 +0200, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
> On 03-05-12 13:27, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> ...
> > function reverse(b : byte) : byte; assembler; nostackframe;
> > asm
> >.long 0xe6ff0f30 // rbit r0, r0
> >lsr r0, r0, #23
> > end;
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been looking a bit fu
On 03-05-12 13:27, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
...
function reverse(b : byte) : byte; assembler; nostackframe;
asm
.long 0xe6ff0f30 // rbit r0, r0
lsr r0, r0, #23
end;
Hi,
I've been looking a bit further at this.
I disassembled the code and this is the result :
8000150: e6ff0f30
15 matches
Mail list logo