[fpc-pascal] makepack broken?

2012-03-12 Thread Fabio Luis Girardi
Are install/makepack script broken? I run it and I got following output: $ export CHECKLIBGDB=no $ export NOGDB=1 $ touch ../doc-pdf.tar.gz $./makepack ... Copying install.sh Creating binary.x86_64-linux.tar tar: units*.x86_64-linux.tar.gz: Cannot stat: No such file or directory tar: Exiting with

[fpc-pascal] MSEgit 1.0

2012-03-12 Thread Martin Schreiber
Hi, If you are interested in a FPC-based GPL-ed git frontend, MSEgit 1.0 has been released. Binaries: https://sourceforge.net/projects/mseuniverse/files/msegit/1_0/ Screenshots: https://sourceforge.net/projects/mseuniverse/ Source: http://gitorious.org/mseuniverse/mseuniverse/trees/master/tool

Re: [fpc-pascal] Spam

2012-03-12 Thread Jürgen Hestermann
waldo kitty schrieb: > ummm... speaking as one who has fought the spammers and won their mailbox back from them, this is much bovine fecal material... i have fought "them" from +1000/day spams back to less than ~5/day... it is very possible but one nes to stay vigilant and report the spams to t

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: compiling 2.6.1 from 2.4.5

2012-03-12 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Thierry B. said: > >> So I just try your advice. Builds : > >> - 2.6.0 from 2.4.5 : oops, not 2.4.4 but it is : OK > >> - 2.6.1 from 2.6.0 : NOK : __missing_command_DATA2INC -b -s fppkg.cfg > >> fppkg.inc fppkg > >> > >> same error, so there is something wrong with 2.6.1 >

[fpc-pascal] Re: compiling 2.6.1 from 2.4.5

2012-03-12 Thread Thierry B.
Le 12/03/2012 01:38, Jonas Maebe a écrit : On 11 Mar 2012, at 22:07, Thierry B. wrote: So I just try your advice. Builds : - 2.6.0 from 2.4.5 : oops, not 2.4.4 but it is : OK - 2.6.1 from 2.6.0 : NOK : __missing_command_DATA2INC -b -s fppkg.cfg fppkg.inc fppkg same error, so there is somethi