On Monday 30 of January 2012 20:17:22 Andrew Haines wrote:
> On 01/30/12 02:19, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > On 29 January 2012 16:31, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> >> GTK offers a plain C interface. QT only offers a C++ interface. FPC does
> >> not (fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries.
On Monday 30 January 2012 23:08:36 Krzysztof wrote:
> > the qt interface. The gpl? license may or may not make that possible
the binding and Qt are LGPL
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listi
> It seems to me that you could compile qt4pas.c (or what ever the source
> file(s) of libqt4pas.so is) into a qt4pas.o and just link them
> statically with {$link qt4pas.o} which then would leave out the
> requirement for libqt4pas.so to be distributed with any program using
> the qt interface. Th
On 01/30/12 02:19, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 29 January 2012 16:31, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>>
>> GTK offers a plain C interface. QT only offers a C++ interface. FPC does not
>> (fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries. LibQT4Pas offers a
>> plain C interface to QT for use by FPC.
On 30.01.2012 15:43, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
On 30/01/2012 11:25, Sven Barth wrote:
I wouldn't say that there is no plan for C++ support as some code for
this already exists in the compiler. While it's true that different
C++ compilers are incompatible to each other and that also G++ likes
to chang
On 30/01/2012 11:25, Sven Barth wrote:
> I wouldn't say that there is no plan for C++ support as some code for
> this already exists in the compiler. While it's true that different
> C++ compilers are incompatible to each other and that also G++ likes
> to change its formats now and then, the basi
On Monday 30 of January 2012 14:27:10 Ludo Brands wrote:
> > Eh, I meant how does ruby, lua, objective c, and similar
> > tools bind the
> > C++ api. Do they use an automatic tool that converts QT C++ objects to
> > procedural? or by hand, someone converts the objects to
> > procedures and structs?
> Eh, I meant how does ruby, lua, objective c, and similar
> tools bind the
> C++ api. Do they use an automatic tool that converts QT C++ objects to
> procedural? or by hand, someone converts the objects to
> procedures and structs? Or do they use the c++ objects
> directly to python objects..
>
Lars wrote:
To keep it on topic, there is programmable hardware available where you
can change the hardware using a hardware programming language. Niklaus
Wirth is interested in such technology. Instead of soldering in capacitors
and resistors, you program in something that emulates a resistor o
Am 30.01.2012 09:22 schrieb :
>
>
>
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Krzysztof wrote:
>
>> Just as I thought - it is object class thing. So if "FPC does not
>> (fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries" there are
>> plans to support it? This will be great
>
>
> There are no plans to support it,
On Monday 30 of January 2012 11:51:10 Den Jean wrote:
> On Monday 30 January 2012 09:28:00 michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
> > There are no plans to support it, since every C++ compiler uses it's own
> > (incompatible) format, and G++ changes it format regularly, so I was
> > given to understand.
Am 30.01.2012 07:53 schrieb "zeljko" :
>
> On Sunday 29 of January 2012 22:16:45 Krzysztof wrote:
>
> > Just as I thought - it is object class thing. So if "FPC does not
>
> > (fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries" there are
>
> > plans to support it? This will be great
>
>
> Mayb
On Monday 30 January 2012 09:28:00 michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
> There are no plans to support it, since every C++ compiler uses it's own
> (incompatible) format, and G++ changes it format regularly, so I was
> given to understand.
even with support for calling c++ methods,
the many inlined
Hi,
Please move the hardware hacking discussions to the fpc-other mailing
list.
Thanks,
Jonas
FPC mailing lists admin
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 30/01/12 09:05, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 30 January 2012 10:54, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
People who repair things are a dying breed.
I fully agree. Totally off-topic, but anybody here know of a course
or books one could buy on basic electronic repairs. Thinking in lines
of PSU etc to
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 30 January 2012 10:54, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
People who repair things are a dying breed.
I fully agree. Totally off-topic, but anybody here know of a course
or books one could buy on basic electronic repairs. Thinking in lines
of PSU etc to start with. I've bee
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 30 January 2012 10:54, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>>
>> People who repair things are a dying breed.
>
> I fully agree. Totally off-topic, but anybody here know of a course
> or books one could buy on basic electronic repairs. Thinking in lines
> of PSU etc to start wit
On 30 January 2012 10:54, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>
> People who repair things are a dying breed.
I fully agree. Totally off-topic, but anybody here know of a course
or books one could buy on basic electronic repairs. Thinking in lines
of PSU etc to start with. I've been long wanting to enter t
On 30/01/2012 02:31, waldo kitty wrote:
[...]
> problem where capacitors were purchased from manufacturers that fell
> to the capacitor espionage situation of some, what?, 15 years ago?
>
Hi Waldo,
it was hard to not notice that situation, 15 years ago, although I never
heard it was espionage..
waldo kitty wrote:
On 1/29/2012 17:41, Lars wrote:
Anything that has Capacitors in it which use wet electrolytic, can dry
out
with age. Old stereos that crackle when you turn up the volume are an
example. In motherboards though it seems it's more a problem that
capacitors blow up and bulge out
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Lars wrote:
>> Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
>>
>> how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
>
> No idea, but Python, ruby, lua and php do not generate real programs
> but inste
waldo kitty wrote:
> On 1/29/2012 17:38, Lars wrote:
>> Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
>>
>> how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
>
>
> :( i don't nderstand why one would want to apply interpreted script
> languages,
> al la BASIC, to today's ta
waldo kitty wrote:
> On 1/29/2012 17:41, Lars wrote:
>> Anything that has Capacitors in it which use wet electrolytic, can dry
>> out
>> with age. Old stereos that crackle when you turn up the volume are an
>> example. In motherboards though it seems it's more a problem that
>> capacitors blow up
On Monday 30 of January 2012 08:35:23 waldo kitty wrote:
> i may have easily misunderstood the OP's post... i tend to read in literan
> english format... ie: if you say eggs are round, that is where i base my
> response unless it is very obvious that there is something else to consider
> which i po
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Krzysztof wrote:
Just as I thought - it is object class thing. So if "FPC does not
(fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries" there are
plans to support it? This will be great
There are no plans to support it, since every C++ compiler uses it's own
(incompa
Hi all,
(Cross posted to Lazarus+FPC lists)
Thanks to UPayload (http://www.delphidabbler.com/articles?article=7) and
some help on the forum, I could implement an alternative way of storing
files in an executable file (basically it just appends them with a footer).
See source: poormansresource.pas
26 matches
Mail list logo
