On 1/30/2012 01:55, zeljko wrote:
On Monday 30 of January 2012 03:28:45 waldo kitty wrote:
> On 1/29/2012 17:38, Lars wrote:
> > Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
> >
> > how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
> :
> :( i don't nderstand
On 29 January 2012 16:31, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> GTK offers a plain C interface. QT only offers a C++ interface. FPC does not
> (fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries. LibQT4Pas offers a
> plain C interface to QT for use by FPC.
>
Can one statically bind the LibQt4Pas into a FP
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Lars wrote:
> Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
>
> how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
No idea, but Python, ruby, lua and php do not generate real programs
but instead are just scripts which run in a interprete
On Monday 30 of January 2012 03:28:45 waldo kitty wrote:
> On 1/29/2012 17:38, Lars wrote:
> > Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
> >
> > how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
> :
> :( i don't nderstand why one would want to apply interpreted script
On Sunday 29 of January 2012 22:16:45 Krzysztof wrote:
> Just as I thought - it is object class thing. So if "FPC does not
> (fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries" there are
> plans to support it? This will be great
Maybe it is possible (or will be possible) to use C++ class, but
On 1/29/2012 17:41, Lars wrote:
Anything that has Capacitors in it which use wet electrolytic, can dry out
with age. Old stereos that crackle when you turn up the volume are an
example. In motherboards though it seems it's more a problem that
capacitors blow up and bulge out which is probably fr
On 1/29/2012 17:38, Lars wrote:
Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
:( i don't nderstand why one would want to apply interpreted script languages,
al la BASIC, to today's tasks... sure, these are neat and "
On 1/29/2012 16:57, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 29 January 2012 16:21, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
My experience is that both media and drives suffer with age, even if not
being used.
I can imagine that might be for the disk, but not the drive itself. I
recently cleaned up my garage and found
On 1/29/2012 09:21, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 29.01.2012 11:55, schrieb Bart:
On 1/29/12, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
I've still backups back to 0.1 on 5 1/4 floppies somewhere :) Though
I've no idea if they still work :)
___
Bu
On 1/29/2012 06:19, ik wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 13:15, Florian Klämpfl mailto:flor...@freepascal.org>> wrote:
Am 29.01.2012 11:55, schrieb Bart:
> On 1/29/12, Florian Klämpfl mailto:flor...@freepascal.org>> wrote:
>> I've still backups back to 0.1 on 5 1/4 floppies somewhere
On 1/29/2012 05:55, Bart wrote:
On 1/29/12, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
I've still backups back to 0.1 on 5 1/4 floppies somewhere :) Though
I've no idea if they still work :)
___
But do you have a machine to read them?
if florian doesn't, i do ;)
i s
Anything that has Capacitors in it which use wet electrolytic, can dry out
with age. Old stereos that crackle when you turn up the volume are an
example. In motherboards though it seems it's more a problem that
capacitors blow up and bulge out which is probably from usage rather than
idle age.
G
Do other languages like python use the plain c interface, or C++?
how about something like ruby, lua, objective C, php ..
Krzysztof wrote:
> Just as I thought - it is object class thing. So if "FPC does not
> (fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries" there are
> plans to support
On 29 January 2012 16:21, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
>
> My experience is that both media and drives suffer with age, even if not
> being used.
I can imagine that might be for the disk, but not the drive itself. I
recently cleaned up my garage and found a crate full of old hardware
(boxes and boxes
On 29 Jan 12, at 20:51, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:13:36 +0100
> Sven Barth wrote:
>
> >[...]
> > >> -WF = {$apptype fs}: Fullscreen application on EMX and OS/2
> > >
> > > For 2.7.1 too?
> > > The option is missing in the ppcx64 -h help.
> >
> > I took this knowledge from
Just as I thought - it is object class thing. So if "FPC does not
(fully) support directly calling external C++ libraries" there are
plans to support it? This will be great
2012/1/29 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
>
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Krzysztof wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am wondering. If I build applica
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Krzysztof wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering. If I build application for linux using gtk2 widgetset
for GNOME (or XFCE etc.) and send this program to my friend, then he
can run it without any external librarys (of course if he have gnome
too), this same thing on windows. But why w
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:13:36 +0100
Sven Barth wrote:
>[...]
> >> -WF = {$apptype fs}: Fullscreen application on EMX and OS/2
> >
> > For 2.7.1 too?
> > The option is missing in the ppcx64 -h help.
>
> I took this knowledge from the compiler's source directly, so yes.
>
>[...]
> > The "obscure l
On 29.01.2012 18:31, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:03:56 +0100
Sven Barth wrote:
On 29.01.2012 17:04, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi,
According to fpc -h (2.7.1):
Option -WG creates graphic type application (EMX, OS/2, Windows).
Option -WC creates console type application (EMX,
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:03:56 +0100
Sven Barth wrote:
> On 29.01.2012 17:04, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to fpc -h (2.7.1):
> >
> > Option -WG creates graphic type application (EMX, OS/2, Windows).
> > Option -WC creates console type application (EMX, OS/2, Windows).
> >
> >
On 29.01.2012 17:04, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi,
According to fpc -h (2.7.1):
Option -WG creates graphic type application (EMX, OS/2, Windows).
Option -WC creates console type application (EMX, OS/2, Windows).
fpc -h (2.6.1) knows also:
Option -WF creates full screen type application (EMX, OS/
Hi,
According to fpc -h (2.7.1):
Option -WG creates graphic type application (EMX, OS/2, Windows).
Option -WC creates console type application (EMX, OS/2, Windows).
fpc -h (2.6.1) knows also:
Option -WF creates full screen type application (EMX, OS/2)
And the "user" documentation knows one more
On 29.01.2012 15:21, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 29.01.2012 11:55, schrieb Bart:
On 1/29/12, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
I've still backups back to 0.1 on 5 1/4 floppies somewhere :) Though
I've no idea if they still work :)
___
B
On 29 Jan 2012, at 15:29, Krzysztof wrote:
> But why when I build application on
> KDE interface I need some external libQT4Pas to run it and my friend
> need it too (he have KDE so all QT librarys too)? There is no
> libGTK4Pas so why exists layer libQT4Pas? What is difference between
> GTK and
Hi,
I am wondering. If I build application for linux using gtk2 widgetset
for GNOME (or XFCE etc.) and send this program to my friend, then he
can run it without any external librarys (of course if he have gnome
too), this same thing on windows. But why when I build application on
KDE interface I
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 29.01.2012 11:55, schrieb Bart:
On 1/29/12, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
I've still backups back to 0.1 on 5 1/4 floppies somewhere :) Though
I've no idea if they still work :)
___
But do you have a machine to read them?
I've s
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:19 PM, ik wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 13:15, Florian Klämpfl
> wrote:
>>
>> Am 29.01.2012 11:55, schrieb Bart:
>> > On 1/29/12, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>> >> I've still backups back to 0.1 on 5 1/4 floppies somewhere :) Though
>> >> I've no idea if they still work
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 13:15, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 29.01.2012 11:55, schrieb Bart:
> > On 1/29/12, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> >> I've still backups back to 0.1 on 5 1/4 floppies somewhere :) Though
> >> I've no idea if they still work :)
> >> ___
Am 29.01.2012 11:55, schrieb Bart:
> On 1/29/12, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>> I've still backups back to 0.1 on 5 1/4 floppies somewhere :) Though
>> I've no idea if they still work :)
>> ___
>
> But do you have a machine to read them?
I've still a 5 1/4
On 1/29/12, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> I've still backups back to 0.1 on 5 1/4 floppies somewhere :) Though
> I've no idea if they still work :)
> ___
But do you have a machine to read them?
Bart
___
fpc-pascal
Am 27.01.2012 10:14, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> Hi,
>
> I stumbled upon the following. No idea where this FTP server lives,
> but the link came from the Free Pascal documentation downloads page.
>
> Anyway, while browsing there, I came across FPK (what is now known as
> FPC) v0.2 source code re
31 matches
Mail list logo
