On 09 Jan 2012, at 00:12, leledumbo wrote:
> Since the title is still valid, I'd like ask about the usage of java
> collections in generic style. For instance java.util.ArrayList. How can I
> construct JUArrayList with Integer constraint as in Java?
>
> e.g.: ArrayList a = new ArrayList;
Java-s
Since the title is still valid, I'd like ask about the usage of java
collections in generic style. For instance java.util.ArrayList. How can I
construct JUArrayList with Integer constraint as in Java?
e.g.: ArrayList a = new ArrayList;
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general
On 08 Jan 2012, at 21:26, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 08.01.2012 21:03, leledumbo wrote:
>> 1. The wiki instruction
>>
>> The first paragraph says:
>>
>> "Building the JVM compiler, RTL and utilities is currently not yet supported
>> using the top-level makefile"
>>
>> yet in "Building the compiler
> Pass "-XP " (without the quotes, but with the space after the parameter)
to the compiler, then it will not prepend "jvm-java-" to the java
binary. You might also want to check your fpc.cfg as there it might add
the cpu-os-prefix unconditionally if it detects a crosscompilation
(check for #IFD
On 08.01.2012 21:03, leledumbo wrote:
I finally managed to compile the latest revision of jvmbackend port, however
I've got some problems during compilation and execution:
1. The wiki instruction
The first paragraph says:
"Building the JVM compiler, RTL and utilities is currently not yet suppo
Additional info: assembling the resulting .j manually and execute the
resulting .class works though
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Some-questions-regarding-jvmbackend-port-tp5129886p5129888.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list ar
I finally managed to compile the latest revision of jvmbackend port, however
I've got some problems during compilation and execution:
1. The wiki instruction
The first paragraph says:
"Building the JVM compiler, RTL and utilities is currently not yet supported
using the top-level makefile"
yet
Michael,
In a exemple folder ConsoleRunner inside FPC, I found something like
TestRunner.pp. It's something like the ConsoleRunner of Lazarus
Components. I added my unit in this application and after compiling, I
could run my tests.
I am really entusiastic with FPCUnit. It's really easy to c
On 08.01.2012 16:31, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Follow-up:
I moved consoletestrunner unit to fcl. Revision 20010.
That was quite some time you needed there: 8 minutes. :P
Regards,
Sven
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
ht
Follow-up:
I moved consoletestrunner unit to fcl. Revision 20010.
Michael.
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Hello,
After your previous mails about this, I have discussed this with Vincent
Snijders, the author of the console runner class. The console runner class of
the LCL
Hello,
After your previous mails about this, I have discussed this with Vincent Snijders,
the author of the console runner class. The console runner class of the LCL does
not really have any dependencies on the LCL, only on FCL.
So, it will be moved to the FCL, Vincent has agreed to this.
Yo
On 08.01.2012 13:49, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Sunday 08 January 2012 13:35:49 schrieb Sven Barth:
On 08.01.2012 13:06, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Sunday 08 January 2012 02:17:29 schrieb Luciano de Souza:
I have downloaded a Lazarus deb package compatible with FPC 2.4.4. I try
to install with
Am Sunday 08 January 2012 13:35:49 schrieb Sven Barth:
> On 08.01.2012 13:06, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> > Am Sunday 08 January 2012 02:17:29 schrieb Luciano de Souza:
> >> I have downloaded a Lazarus deb package compatible with FPC 2.4.4. I try
> >> to install with: "sudo dpkg -i *". It fails, so:
On 08.01.2012 13:06, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Sunday 08 January 2012 02:17:29 schrieb Luciano de Souza:
I have downloaded a Lazarus deb package compatible with FPC 2.4.4. I try
to install with: "sudo dpkg -i *". It fails, so: "sudo apt-get install -f".
...
...
...
This was already s
The unit consoletestrunner from $lazarusdir/components/fpcunit/console
might still be useful to you, because it allows writting the testresults
to the console. The unit has NO dependencies to the LCL, so you can
simply copy it and compile it along with your tests. Normally you use it
like this
In our previous episode, Luciano de Souza said:
> Now, I understand. FPCUnit and FPCRegistry do not have LCL dependences.
> What depends on LCL is the runner called Console Runner. This name make
> me confused!
In package/fcl-fpcunit/src/demo/consolerunner
there is a runner that is not LCL depe
Perhaps, the issue has no a happy end for all, but for me, that don't
use Lazarus and I won't have to do it due FPCUnit, everything is
fortunatelly OK. It would be unconfortable to install many megabytes to
use almost nothing. Now, I am happy with Freepascal.
In the future, it's not impossible
Now, I understand. FPCUnit and FPCRegistry do not have LCL dependences.
What depends on LCL is the runner called Console Runner. This name make
me confused!
I ahve alredy read the documentation, but I could not understand.
Perhaps, perhaps my weak english... Well, the fact is that everything i
Am Sunday 08 January 2012 02:17:29 schrieb Luciano de Souza:
> I have downloaded a Lazarus deb package compatible with FPC 2.4.4. I try
> to install with: "sudo dpkg -i *". It fails, so: "sudo apt-get install -f".
> ...
> ...
> ...
This was already some time discussed here and in my opinion thi
> The same as always: the latest release. As of January 1st, 2012, that means
2.6.0
OK, I finally have a reason to use stable release...
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Supported-FPC-revision-to-compile-jvmbackend-port-tp5127717p5129054.html
Sent
20 matches
Mail list logo
