[fpc-pascal] use synaser to output data to com port

2011-11-27 Thread John Lee
I'm using synaser on win xp to receive data from a com port, via the prolific usb-serial driver. eg ser.RecvTerminated(6000,term_str); Can I send the same data out to another com port w/o the program waiting for it to be read by another app eg using sendbuffer? or something else? but isn't neces

Re: [fpc-pascal] OpenGL ES bitmap drawing

2011-11-27 Thread Sven Barth
On 27.11.2011 17:26, Sven Barth wrote: On 26.11.2011 21:32, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: // Displacement trick for exact pixelization glTranslatef(0.357, 0.357, 0); Untested guess: try to move your object in front of the virtual camera (which is located at (0, 0, 0) ). Thus set the Z val

Re: [fpc-pascal] OpenGL ES bitmap drawing

2011-11-27 Thread Sven Barth
On 26.11.2011 21:32, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: // Displacement trick for exact pixelization glTranslatef(0.357, 0.357, 0); Untested guess: try to move your object in front of the virtual camera (which is located at (0, 0, 0) ). Thus set the Z value to something negative (e.g.

Re: [fpc-pascal] The strange case of arm-linux-ld: skipping incompatible

2011-11-27 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho said: Browse through the below thread, mainly my and Jonas posts: http://lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,8084.msg57377.html#msg57377 ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org

Re: [fpc-pascal] Free Pascal 2.6.0rc1 released

2011-11-27 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Bernd said: > > > > That makes sense, but you are in a wrong branch then. > > I wanted to switch down one gear, not two. What would be the correct > 2.6 stabilizing/soon-to-become-stable branch if this is the wrong one? 2.6.0rc1 is the newest there is on the 2.6 branches.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Free Pascal 2.6.0rc1 released

2011-11-27 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Bernd said: > > If > > people are so easily confused, they should stay away from development > > branches. > > This is supposed to be a stable branch Only after 2.6.0. Though the situation is not really different for a .2 or .4 release, only shorter. > and there is no ne