In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
> I've never seen any reports of heaptrc failing to report memory leaks.
> Most likely, your problems stem from internal heap fragmentation
> rather than from memory leaks. Such problems can usually be solved by
> using the "cmem" unit, which falls b
In our previous episode, Bernd said:
> >> The branch fixes_2_6 still has the version 2.5.1. shouldn't this be
> >> set to 2.6.0-RC1.1?
> >
> > No. Only releases have even version numbers (RC or not).
>
> Thats why I wrote RC1.1 to solve this dilemma, to give it an odd
> number between RC1 and RC2.
On 24/11/2011, Bernd wrote:
> number than the already released release candidate itself. Thats the
> main thing that is so confusing about it. It also leads to the
> necessity to modify the tag after tagging which is considered bad
> practice.
Don't worry, you are not alone. I also find this way
On 21-11-2011 9:31, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> On 20-11-2011 10:31, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> On 19-11-2011 23:36, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 19-11-2011 13:28, Reinier Olislagers wrote: I wonder
whether/what changes are required fo
On 24/11/2011 19:34, Jonas Maebe wrote:
In that case, you did not hit the same problem as the original poster (your "I also
hit this problem recently" is what triggered my response). His problem was that if
you call a non-virtual constructor on a class reference variable, that the constructor i
On 24 Nov 2011, at 23:00, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
> On 24/11/2011 08:02, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>>
>> On 24 Nov 2011, at 02:58, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
>>
>>> On 23/11/2011 18:48, Jesus Reyes wrote:
where I would expect:
cls class is TFoo
TObj.create
TFoo.c
On 24/11/2011 05:47, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2011-11-24 03:58, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
possible to get the expected behavior without forcing programmer to
create a virtual constructor by using the new RTTI
What has the "new RTTI" got to do with anything?
Simply define TObj.Creat
On 24/11/2011 08:02, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 24 Nov 2011, at 02:58, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
On 23/11/2011 18:48, Jesus Reyes wrote:
in the following example The output is:
cls class is TFoo
TObj.create
where I would expect:
cls class is TFoo
TObj.create
TFoo.create
I also hit this
On: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:06:18 +0100 Jonas Maebe
wrote
> On 24 Nov 2011, at 16:28,
> > wrote:
> > ...
> > only odd thing was that TotalAllocated sometimes came back negative in
> > the threads as the program approached the point of running out of
> > memory
>
> The fact that the heap
I'm Trying to send notification using D-Bus Notify method.
The thing is, that I do not understand how to properly use it.
My current code:
https://github.com/ik5/display-quotes/blob/master/src/units/untquotedbus.pas
#L92
I'ved marked the place where i Have AccessViolation exception.
What am I
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 20:19, Ludo Brands wrote:
> **
>
>
>
> I'm Trying to send notification using D-Bus Notify method.
> The thing is, that I do not understand how to properly use it.
> My current code:
> https://github.com/ik5/display-quotes/blob/master/src/units/untquotedbus.pas#L92
>
> I've
I'm Trying to send notification using D-Bus Notify method.
The thing is, that I do not understand how to properly use it.
My current code:
https://github.com/ik5/display-quotes/blob/master/src/units/untquotedbus.pas
#L92
I'ved marked the place where i Have AccessViolation exception.
What am I
Hello,
I'm Trying to send notification using D-Bus Notify method.
The thing is, that I do not understand how to properly use it.
My current code:
https://github.com/ik5/display-quotes/blob/master/src/units/untquotedbus.pas#L92
I'ved marked the place where i Have AccessViolation exception.
What am
On 24 Nov 2011, at 18:14, Bernd wrote:
> Yes, I understand the intention. But this leads to the dilemma that
> now the branch which is by definition always same or more advanced
> than the last release(candidate) from it still has a *lower* version
> number than the already released release candi
2011/11/24 Sven Barth :
> It's not about the RCx, but about the 2.6.0.
Yes, I understand the intention. But this leads to the dilemma that
now the branch which is by definition always same or more advanced
than the last release(candidate) from it still has a *lower* version
number than the already
Am 24.11.2011 17:52, schrieb Bernd:
2011/11/24 Jonas Maebe:
The branch fixes_2_6 still has the version 2.5.1. shouldn't this be
set to 2.6.0-RC1.1?
No. Only releases have even version numbers (RC or not).
Thats why I wrote RC1.1 to solve this dilemma, to give it an odd
number between RC1 an
2011/11/24 Jonas Maebe :
>> The branch fixes_2_6 still has the version 2.5.1. shouldn't this be
>> set to 2.6.0-RC1.1?
>
> No. Only releases have even version numbers (RC or not).
Thats why I wrote RC1.1 to solve this dilemma, to give it an odd
number between RC1 and RC2.
Am 24.11.2011 17:30, schrieb Juha Manninen:
2011/11/24 Sven Barth mailto:pascaldra...@googlemail.com>>
Thanks for the explanations.
In mode Delphi and my generic branch (I hope ^^) you are able to do
it like this as well:
myV := TMyDerived.Create(False);
if myV is TFPGObjectLi
2011/11/24 Sven Barth
Thanks for the explanations.
In mode Delphi and my generic branch (I hope ^^) you are able to do it like
> this as well:
>
> myV := TMyDerived.Create(False);
> if myV is TFPGObjectList then
> ...
>
> Under the condition that "TMyDerived" is declared like in your previous
Am 24.11.2011 17:10, schrieb Juha Manninen:
Now, if I do:
myV := TMyDerived.Create(False);
if myV is TFPGObjectList then
...
it gives:
unit1.pas(67,10) Error: Class or Object types "TMyDerived" and
"TFPGObjectList" are not related
In my opinion they are related.
Maybe generics ar
Now, if I do:
myV := TMyDerived.Create(False);
if myV is TFPGObjectList then
...
it gives:
unit1.pas(67,10) Error: Class or Object types "TMyDerived" and
"TFPGObjectList" are not related
In my opinion they are related.
Maybe generics are good only for situations where you don't need to
Am 24.11.2011 17:00, schrieb Juha Manninen:
... Sorry, forgot subject first
See my other mail...
Regards,
Sven
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Am 24.11.2011 16:56, schrieb Juha Manninen:
It says:
unit1.pas(40,24) Error: Duplicate identifier "FreeObjects"
Why? If I change "FreeObjects" to "aFreeObjects" then it works. Again why?
You simply picked a bad example, because "TFPGObjectList" contains a
property called "FreeObjects", thus
On 24 Nov 2011, at 16:28, > wrote:
At no point did the heap status reveal the growing amount of space
tied up: the
only odd thing was that TotalAllocated sometimes came back negative in
the threads as the program approached the point of running out of
memory
(at the 2GB addressing limit;
... Sorry, forgot subject first
I try to learn to use generics properly.
First, this is a class definition without generics:
TMyDerived = class(TObjectList)
private
MyInt: integer;
public
constructor Create(FreeObjects: Boolean=True);
end;
It works. Now I try to derive a clas
I try to learn to use generics properly.
First, this is a class definition without generics:
TMyDerived = class(TObjectList)
private
MyInt: integer;
public
constructor Create(FreeObjects: Boolean=True);
end;
It works. Now I try to derive a class with generics:
TMyGen = speciali
A recent query:
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:27:16 + From: Mark Morgan Lloyd
Subject: [fpc-pascal] Debugging ancient
heap allocation
seems not to have received a reply. The problem of debugging
memory allocation, however, is wider and not just involving
ancient code!
I am using:
Compiler 2.4
On 24 Nov 2011, at 12:06, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Isn't it possible to put all processors in the compiler.
In theory, that would be possible with lots of rewriting. In practice
there is little or no reason to spend time on that. You can always use
"fpc -Pi386" and "fpc -Parm" to call the
On 24 Nov 2011, at 10:46, Bernd wrote:
The branch fixes_2_6 still has the version 2.5.1. shouldn't this be
set to 2.6.0-RC1.1?
No. Only releases have even version numbers (RC or not). Branches are
only updated to the next version number (in this case, that will be
2.6.1) once the correspo
Isn't it possible to put all processors in the compiler.
At least ARM and 8086 because they are the most popular.
As I know now it is one compiler program each processor.
Just a question.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://
On 24 Nov 2011, at 02:58, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
On 23/11/2011 18:48, Jesus Reyes wrote:
in the following example The output is:
cls class is TFoo
TObj.create
where I would expect:
cls class is TFoo
TObj.create
TFoo.create
I also hit this problem recently
Found that this is one
I have a question about the structure of the svn.
The branch fixes_2_6 still has the version 2.5.1. shouldn't this be
set to 2.6.0-RC1.1? to indicate that this is always the newest 2.6.x
version (newer than any 2.6 release or candidate ever released from
this branch) and as such already newer than
Am 24.11.2011 09:43, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
Hi,
I just tried to compile a test.pp file inside my /tmp directory. FPC
complained because there existed a /tmp/test/ directory!!
Is this a normal or known limitation of FPC? Or does the blame fall onto
the ld linker?
Of course this is normal.
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> I just tried to compile a test.pp file inside my /tmp directory. FPC
> complained because there existed a /tmp/test/ directory!!
Why is that strange?
> Is this a normal or known limitation of FPC? Or does the blame fall onto
> the ld linker?
I'
Am 06.11.11 00:27, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
Hello,
We have placed the first release-candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 2.6.0 on our ftp-servers.
You can help improve the upcoming 2.6.0 release by downloading and
testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done h
On 2011-11-24 03:58, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
> possible to get the expected behavior without forcing programmer to
> create a virtual constructor by using the new RTTI
What has the "new RTTI" got to do with anything?
Simply define TObj.Create as virtual, and TFoo.Create as overridden.
Hi,
I just tried to compile a test.pp file inside my /tmp directory. FPC
complained because there existed a /tmp/test/ directory!!
Is this a normal or known limitation of FPC? Or does the blame fall onto
the ld linker?
8<-8<-8<-8<-8<
[tmp]$
37 matches
Mail list logo
