I am trying to write a multi-core processor simulator . I want 256 of them
run as simultaneous threads.
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Strange-issue-with-threads-tp2823464p4728565.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at
Thanks, this definitely helps at least the reason why it is breaking. I am
not sure how to get around it though.
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Strange-issue-with-threads-tp2823464p4728549.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list arc
On 08/23/11 22:46, rzbhatti wrote:
> I followed the bug report
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13798
> and it says that it is resolved and closed.
>
> I am using fpc 2.4.4 on Windows XP. Like Luca Olivetti I am trying to create
> 256 threads, but it chocks at 121 saying :
Euhm ? You are
Al 23/08/11 22:46, En/na rzbhatti ha escrit:
> I followed the bug report
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13798
> and it says that it is resolved and closed.
>
> I am using fpc 2.4.4 on Windows XP. Like Luca Olivetti I am trying to create
> 256 threads, but it chocks at 121 saying :
>
>
I followed the bug report
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13798
and it says that it is resolved and closed.
I am using fpc 2.4.4 on Windows XP. Like Luca Olivetti I am trying to create
256 threads, but it chocks at 121 saying :
An unhandled exception occurred at $0041099C :
EThread : Fai
Hi,
For developers that use FPC sources from SVN, like me, I ask:
1. There are some advantage to use 'make install' to compile FPC? Which?
2. There are some advantage to install (make install) in a directory
different of the sources? Which?
Thanks,
Marcos Douglas
_
On 23 Aug 2011, at 08:46, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> I just searched all my PDF docs for FPC, and couldn't find a single
> reference to 'crossinstall' anywhere. :-(
The FPC documentation does not document building FPC itself, that is what the
buildfaq is for (although apparently it doesn't ment
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Den Jean wrote:
> On Monday 22 August 2011 23:24:29 Jonas Maebe wrote:
>> 3. Install everything to the same prefix. Add CROSSINSTALL=1 to the "make
>> install" line for which you do not want to install the utilities (e.g., if
>> you want the default compiler to be
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 22 Aug 2011, at 23:08, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>> So, I understood right, is not supported.
>> I not need these utilities and I do not know if they all are important
>> or who uses them, etc.
>
> Some of them are used by the makefiles, some
Am 23.08.2011 09:16, schrieb Andreas Schneider:
This code prints on the screen "+Inf", but I think it should be "NaN".
Is this a bug or a special case in computer arithmetic?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_by_zero#In_computer_arithmetic
Oh, thank you. I should not read only the german
At Tuesday, 23.08.2011 on 8:57 Michael Fuchs wrote:
> Hello,
>
>WriteLn(FloatToStr(100 / 0));
>
> This code prints on the screen "+Inf", but I think it should be "NaN".
> Is this a bug or a special case in computer arithmetic?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_by_zero#In_computer_arithm
11 matches
Mail list logo
