Re: [fpc-pascal] Non-standard baud rates in OS X | IOSSIOSPEED IOCTL

2011-08-14 Thread Bruce Tulloch
I can now confirm that the ioctl definition I used is correct, tested on a Snow Leopard system with an FT232RL chip USB/Serial chip. Cheers, Bruce. On 08/15/11 15:23, Bruce Tulloch wrote: > Apple have define an IOCTL (since Tiger) called IOSSIOSPEED which > facilitates non-standard baud rates. >

[fpc-pascal] Non-standard baud rates in OS X | IOSSIOSPEED IOCTL

2011-08-14 Thread Bruce Tulloch
Apple have define an IOCTL (since Tiger) called IOSSIOSPEED which facilitates non-standard baud rates. They publish a C example which explains it: http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#samplecode/SerialPortSample/Introduction/Intro.html Attached is a patch for FPC's darwin RTL which adds this

Re: RE : RE : RE : RE : [fpc-pascal] Re: RE : RE : RE : Assigningvalue toftVariantdatatype& varbytes-still stuck

2011-08-14 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Ludo Brands said: > > > > Your remarks really hurt my motivation to look at those > > bugreports at all. That and the fact that I spent a holiday > > week closing quite some goes unnoticed. > > Marco, all my excuses if you felt my message suggested I was pointing in > y

Re: RE : RE : RE : RE : [fpc-pascal] Re: RE : RE : RE : Assigningvalue toftVariantdatatype& varbytes-still stuck

2011-08-14 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On 14-8-2011 16:30, Ludo Brands wrote: >> In our previous episode, Ludo Brands said: >>> Sorry mate. No reaction. Everybody seems to be happy with >> the current >>> implementation. Under these circumstances, I'm not going to >> spend any >>> time on creating a patch that makes a, minor, change

Re: RE : [fpc-pascal] ftGuid displaytext & output

2011-08-14 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On 13-8-2011 13:04, Ludo Brands wrote: > TGuidField stores guid in the string format (GuidToString). > EF.Field.AsString should give you the correct string value. > > Ludo Thanks, Ludo. I think I was using AsString at first. I'll have a further look; maybe I'm putting in rubbish; I'll probably h

RE : RE : RE : RE : [fpc-pascal] Re: RE : RE : RE : Assigningvalue toftVariantdatatype& varbytes-still stuck

2011-08-14 Thread Ludo Brands
> In our previous episode, Ludo Brands said: > > > > PS: no misunderstanding. I'm volunteering to make these > changes;) > > > > > > > I'd be happy to help with testing at least! > > > > Sorry mate. No reaction. Everybody seems to be happy with > the current > > implementation. Under these cir

Re: RE : RE : RE : [fpc-pascal] Re: RE : RE : RE : Assigning value toftVariantdatatype& varbytes-still stuck

2011-08-14 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Ludo Brands said: > > > PS: no misunderstanding. I'm volunteering to make these changes;) > > > > > I'd be happy to help with testing at least! > > Sorry mate. No reaction. Everybody seems to be happy with the current > implementation. Under these circumstances, I'm not

RE : RE : RE : [fpc-pascal] Re: RE : RE : RE : Assigning value toftVariantdatatype& varbytes-still stuck

2011-08-14 Thread Ludo Brands
> > What I propose is: > > > > If need be the discussion can be moved to fpc-devel. > > > > Ludo > > > > PS: no misunderstanding. I'm volunteering to make these changes;) > > > I'd be happy to help with testing at least! Sorry mate. No reaction. Everybody seems to be happy with the curre