I saw that h2pas translated:
typedef void(*callback)(int pos, void* userdata);
to
callback = procedure (pos:cint; var userdata:pointer);cdecl;
shouldn't it be?
callback = procedure (pos:cint; userdata:pointer);cdecl;
Paulo Costa
___
fpc-pascal mail
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In each case, I think I have an approach which should speed things up, and
still sticks to the design principles of fpImage.
The only design I see in fpimage is a general effort to try to support
anything at once. Nevermind the costs.
Not "nev
On 24.04.2011 13:49, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Sunday 24 April 2011 12:45:50 schrieb Sven Barth:
On 24.04.2011 12:14, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Sunday 24 April 2011 11:44:18 schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
How to find the return adress of the calling code of a
procedure/function?
Where in the sta
2011/4/24 Paulo Costa :
> the TSdpoVideo4L2 component has the V4L2 translated...
Thanks. This is interesting. I saw this before but didn't look deeper
into it after I read "UVC compliant USB cameras" in the wiki, this
seemed to imply for me that it would only work with the subset of
cameras that
In our previous episode, Paulo Costa said:
> I've come across some constructs that I'm not sure how to translate:
>
> A procedure where one of the arguments is declared as:
> size_t arg;
>
> also a macro where appears:
> sizeof(size_t)
>
> I replaced size_t by PtrUInt, is there a better alternat
I've come across some constructs that I'm not sure how to translate:
A procedure where one of the arguments is declared as:
size_t arg;
also a macro where appears:
sizeof(size_t)
I replaced size_t by PtrUInt, is there a better alternative?
Paulo Costa
On 24/04/2011 11:24, Bernd wrote:
2011/4/24 Sven Barth:
Hi!
I did convert the V4L2 headers some time ago, but did not publish them yet.
If you want to, I can send you the Pascal file. I tested it with a radio
tuner, so it should work mostly.
This would surely be helpful. Please consider also
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> > Ah, I don't considered those languages. At least not where any discussions
> > about performance or efficiency apply ;_)
>
> The topic was the availability of generics.
> In that field, all languages are viewed.
If you say so. Anyway, while
Am Sunday 24 April 2011 12:45:50 schrieb Sven Barth:
> On 24.04.2011 12:14, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> > Am Sunday 24 April 2011 11:44:18 schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
> >> How to find the return adress of the calling code of a
> >> procedure/function?
> >>
> >> Where in the stack is the information to
On 24.04.2011 12:24, Bernd wrote:
2011/4/24 Sven Barth:
Hi!
I did convert the V4L2 headers some time ago, but did not publish them yet.
If you want to, I can send you the Pascal file. I tested it with a radio
tuner, so it should work mostly.
This would surely be helpful. Please consider also
On 24.04.2011 12:14, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Sunday 24 April 2011 11:44:18 schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
How to find the return adress of the calling code of a procedure/function?
Where in the stack is the information to the return adress?
stack + - x?
asm
mov eax , [ ebp + 4 ]
end;
eax i
2011/4/24 Sven Barth :
> Hi!
>
> I did convert the V4L2 headers some time ago, but did not publish them yet.
> If you want to, I can send you the Pascal file. I tested it with a radio
> tuner, so it should work mostly.
This would surely be helpful. Please consider also releasing them with
an FPC c
Am Sunday 24 April 2011 11:44:18 schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
> How to find the return adress of the calling code of a procedure/function?
>
> Where in the stack is the information to the return adress?
>
> stack + - x?
asm
mov eax , [ ebp + 4 ]
end;
eax is the return adress
> How to acess to th
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 11:22:14 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:05:12 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I wrote
How to find the return adress of the calling code of a procedure/function?
Where in the stack is the information to the return adress?
stack + - x?
How to acess to the information in assembler?
Is it in every processor architecture possible, for example ARM?
(actually 80x86).
Is it different in
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 11:22:14 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:05:12 +0200 (CEST)
> > Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> >>
> >>> I wrote a little to
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:05:12 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I wrote a little tool:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/InstantFPC
Nice job. OK to include in FPC as one of the utils ?
A
Hi!
I did convert the V4L2 headers some time ago, but did not publish them
yet. If you want to, I can send you the Pascal file. I tested it with a
radio tuner, so it should work mostly.
Regards,
Sven
On 23.04.2011 22:50, Bernd wrote:
Hi,
I found this:
http://pastebin.com/T4jkeE6F
in a zi
18 matches
Mail list logo
