In our previous episode, Bernd said:
>
> How should I now proceed? Should I try to make this entire thing
> (including its macro pocessor) compile with a current FPC? I don't
> really like this idea because v4l1 is deprecated anyways. And the
> separate macro processor and the makefile also someho
Hi,
I found this:
http://pastebin.com/T4jkeE6F
in a zip file called vfp.tar.bz4 somewhere on the web, it seems not
maintained since ages but obviously it must have compiled at some time
in the past. I am tying to see whether I can hack a quick and dirty
program that is able to open an v4l device
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:27:37 +0200
"Ludo Brands" wrote:
> Nice tool.
>
> 2 requests:
> - I would like to select the compiler. I'm typically working with the svn
> version of compiler but have in my PATH a stable version of the compiler.
> >From the sources I can see that the compiler is searche
Nice tool.
2 requests:
- I would like to select the compiler. I'm typically working with the svn
version of compiler but have in my PATH a stable version of the compiler.
>From the sources I can see that the compiler is searched for only in the
PATH. A simple solution would be to look first for t
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
IMHO it is the long term solution. Anything else would be madness, or minor
damage control at best.
Most of the more "recent" or "new" languages I know do not have generics,
What do yo
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:05:12 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> > I wrote a little tool:
> >
> > http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/InstantFPC
>
> Nice job. OK to include in FPC as one of the utils ?
Are there any outstanding issues
