Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 10 Mar 2011, at 22:33, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
[Reads] Wasn't there a race condition when a thread was created suspended? Was
that fixed?
There was a race condition when a thread was created in a non-suspended stated,
and if it terminated before the constructor finish
On 03/09/11 14:18, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 13:23:55 -0500, Andrew Haines wrote:
>> On 03/09/11 12:26, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>>>
>>> FYL2X calculates the log to the base 2 of tmp, not log to the base e of
>>> tmp? Just a guess.
>>>
>>
>> I originally used log2(Tmp) but switched t
On 10 Mar 2011, at 22:33, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> [Reads] Wasn't there a race condition when a thread was created suspended?
> Was that fixed?
There was a race condition when a thread was created in a non-suspended stated,
and if it terminated before the constructor finished running. This h
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 10 Mar 2011, at 19:27, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
TThread.Resume is marked deprecated. Where is the comment or documentation what
to use now?
http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_Trunk#TThread.Suspend_and_TThread.Resume_are_deprecated
[Reads] Wasn't there a race condi
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:38:11 +0100
Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 10 Mar 2011, at 19:27, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> > TThread.Resume is marked deprecated. Where is the comment or documentation
> > what to use now?
>
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_Trunk#TThread.Suspend_and_TThread.Resum
On 10 Mar 2011, at 19:27, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> TThread.Resume is marked deprecated. Where is the comment or documentation
> what to use now?
http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_Trunk#TThread.Suspend_and_TThread.Resume_are_deprecated
Jonas__
Hi all,
TThread.Resume is marked deprecated. Where is the comment or documentation what
to use now?
Mattias
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 9 March 2011 15:54, wrote:
On , Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I was using this to communicate with an HP instrument a few weeks ago, so
have my own re-implementation of some of the stuff. I'll look at doing a
patch, preparatory to seeing if I can hack a complementary Win-
On 9 March 2011 15:54, wrote:
> On , Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>
>>
>> I was using this to communicate with an HP instrument a few weeks ago, so
>> have my own re-implementation of some of the stuff. I'll look at doing a
>> patch, preparatory to seeing if I can hack a complementary Win-32
>> equi
On , Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I was using this to communicate with an HP instrument a few weeks ago, so
have my own re-implementation of some of the stuff. I'll look at doing a
patch, preparatory to seeing if I can hack a complementary Win-32
equivalent.
Mark, afaik there isn'ta way of
10 matches
Mail list logo
