On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Dejan Boras wrote:
> Is there anyone on this list who uses fpc with android under windows and the
> android emulator(armv5) without problems(e.g.
> basic functionality at least like sysutils, ansistrings, ...)? I'm just
> trying to figure out if I'm doing somethi
El 26/02/2011 16:27, Marco van de Voort escribió:
I never really started it, but one of the things I noticed is that the CPU
instructions for certain goniometric functions don't always accept the full
domain. How have you dealt with that in your code generation (or am I wrong,
it is over 7 years
Hi,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 04:32:14 -0800 (PST), Dejan Boras
wrote:
> Is there anyone on this list who uses fpc with android under windows and
> the android emulator(armv5) without problems(e.g. basic functionality at
> least like sysutils, ansistrings, ...)? I'm just trying to figure out if
> I'm d
Is there anyone on this list who uses fpc with android under windows and the
android emulator(armv5) without problems(e.g. basic functionality at least like
sysutils, ansistrings, ...)? I'm just trying to figure out if I'm doing
something wrong.
___
f
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 27 Feb 2011, at 09:58, leledumbo wrote:
Read the docs. If the size of the argument is greater than native pointer
size, it would be passed by reference.
If the docs say that somewhere, they are wrong. How a "const" parameter is
passed is an imple
On 27 Feb 2011, at 09:58, leledumbo wrote:
> Read the docs. If the size of the argument is greater than native pointer
> size, it would be passed by reference.
If the docs say that somewhere, they are wrong. How a "const" parameter is
passed is an implementation detail (which hence could change
> this seems to be something that i'm learning about... it appears to be a
> bit(???) different than what i am used to with TP/BP 6/7...
>
> in this case, does a const parameter point to the original or a copy of
> the
> original?
Read the docs. If the size of the argument is greater than nat
