On 2/11/2011 01:28, Ben wrote:
Op 2011-02-10 22:24, waldo kitty het geskryf:
the tool to be a native OS/2 FPC tool... the only real change i had to
make was to change "string" to "ansistring"...
Glad to see somebody still uses OS/2. I still have my original disks and
packaging of OS/2 2.1, 3.0
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I'm currently working on a translator from SNMP MIB files to Pascal,
and on a whim decided to see how well they documented. Two questions
if I may.
i) fpdoc appears to lose the fact that a procedure or function is
pre
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I'm currently working on a translator from SNMP MIB files to Pascal, and on a
whim decided to see how well they documented. Two questions if I may.
i) fpdoc appears to lose the fact that a procedure or function is prefixed
"class".
Please fil
(* Program One *)
{$codepage utf8}
{$Mode objfpc}
Uses math,sysutils;
Var cad:ansistring;
c,n:longword;
Begin
c:=2**30; // 1 GiB
n:=4; // with 3 & 4 at fpc 2.4.2, no show Out of Memory
// with 3 & 4 at fpc 2.5.1, no show Out of Memory
(02/11/2011 04:04p.m.
I'm currently working on a translator from SNMP MIB files to Pascal, and
on a whim decided to see how well they documented. Two questions if I may.
i) fpdoc appears to lose the fact that a procedure or function is
prefixed "class".
ii) I've got comments associated with class procedures/funct
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, leledumbo wrote:
Currently tiOPF svn contains tiOPF2 and tiOPF3, which one is recommended for
use? Is tiOPF3 stable enough?
No, and what is more, it will not work, since it is designed to work only
with the new unicodestring support of Delphi 2009+
Michael.
___
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:23 AM, leledumbo wrote:
>
> Currently tiOPF svn contains tiOPF2 and tiOPF3, which one is recommended for
> use? Is tiOPF3 stable enough?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/tiOPF-which-version-to-take-tp3381010p3381010.
Currently tiOPF svn contains tiOPF2 and tiOPF3, which one is recommended for
use? Is tiOPF3 stable enough?
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/tiOPF-which-version-to-take-tp3381010p3381010.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive
