Paul Breneman wrote:
Lukasz Sokol wrote:
Hey,
take a look.
I've basically removed all the calls that were referring to creating,
reading
and writing the procfs file.
Only left init_module and cleanup_module so I only left trivial Hello
World and
Bye-bye messages.
In fact I think even that
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 14 Jan 2011, at 15:02, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Does anybody have an archived copy of FPC 2.x for SPARC Solaris v8 or older?
The ones available by FTP (2.1.1 and 2.4.2) both appear to be for Solaris 10,
i.e. expect newer libraries.
I suspect that it was available or at
Lukasz Sokol wrote:
Hey,
take a look.
I've basically removed all the calls that were referring to creating, reading
and writing the procfs file.
Only left init_module and cleanup_module so I only left trivial Hello World and
Bye-bye messages.
In fact I think even that should be made par with c
Sven Barth wrote:
On 15.01.2011 21:10, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
Henry Vermaak writes:
On 15 January 2011 19:48, Sven Barth wrote:
I might not be able to help you regarding this topic, but I believe
that
you'll get a wall of "use C, god damnit" if you ask there :P
@Sven : it's for fun. Whethe
Hey,
take a look.
I've basically removed all the calls that were referring to creating, reading
and writing the procfs file.
Only left init_module and cleanup_module so I only left trivial Hello World and
Bye-bye messages.
In fact I think even that should be made par with current linux standard.
On 14 Jan 2011, at 15:02, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Does anybody have an archived copy of FPC 2.x for SPARC Solaris v8 or older?
> The ones available by FTP (2.1.1 and 2.4.2) both appear to be for Solaris 10,
> i.e. expect newer libraries.
>
> I suspect that it was available or at least built
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 15 Jan 2011, at 21:16, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
Seems like the instructions don't just have a very fortunate example maybe?
It is simply for an older kernel version. The unfortunate part is that it
doesn't mention which kernel version it's for.
Google suggests that he did
On Saturday, January 15, 2011 22:18 Marcos Douglas wrote:
> Hi,
> There are libs, in Pascal, to convert .doc and/or .html files to .pdf?
I don't think so, but I would suggest to use a headless
OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice for the conversion. Using the Pascal UNO
Bridge you may e
Hi,
There are libs, in Pascal, to convert .doc and/or .html files to .pdf?
Marcos Douglas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Saturday, January 15, 2011 21:42 Frank Church wrote:
> I mean int64 into base64 encoding, as in the mime type.
Oops, my bad. Then yeah, as Henry said the base64 unit should help.
Depending on who and how the number is to be decoded then, you could
also take a look at strutils.Dec2Numb w
On 15.01.2011 21:10, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
Henry Vermaak writes:
On 15 January 2011 19:48, Sven Barth wrote:
I might not be able to help you regarding this topic, but I believe that
you'll get a wall of "use C, god damnit" if you ask there :P
@Sven : it's for fun. Whether I'd be having fun
On 15.01.2011 20:57, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 15 January 2011 19:48, Sven Barth wrote:
On 15.01.2011 20:32, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
Is this something I should ask here or at kernel-newbies ? :)
I might not be able to help you regarding this topic, but I believe that
you'll get a wall of "use C,
On 15 January 2011 18:31, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Saturday, January 15, 2011 18:52 Frank Church wrote:
>
> > Is there a FCL library that can be used to convert a large integer into
> base64 format?
>
>
> Define "large integer" ... in case you mean a normal integer/int64:
> IntToHex(...);
On 15 January 2011 19:40, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> Lukasz Sokol writes:
>
> ah and sorry some clarifications :
> - i posted using gmane web interface that forces me to wrap lines at 80 chars
> manually
> - what happens after: if I tell my system to
> sudo insmod kernel_pmodule
>
> results in
>
> ins
On 15 Jan 2011, at 21:16, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> Seems like the instructions don't just have a very fortunate example maybe?
It is simply for an older kernel version. The unfortunate part is that it
doesn't mention which kernel version it's for.
Jonas___
Jonas Maebe writes:
> > [16646.934537] kernel_pmodule: Unknown symbol unregister_chrdev
> > [16646.934835] kernel_pmodule: Unknown symbol proc_root
> > [16646.935174] kernel_pmodule: Unknown symbol register_chrdev
>
> Since the Linux kernel breaks ABI compatibility on purpose all the time, any
Henry Vermaak writes:
>
> On 15 January 2011 19:48, Sven Barth wrote:
> > I might not be able to help you regarding this topic, but I believe that
> > you'll get a wall of "use C, god damnit" if you ask there :P
@Sven : it's for fun. Whether I'd be having fun is probably debatable but it may
b
Henry Vermaak writes:
>
> On 15 January 2011 19:32, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> > echo " Run 'make oldconfig && make prepare' on kernel src to
fix it."; \
>
> Have you done this? It's required for building modules out of tree, iirc.
>
No but I have installed the kernel-headers and
On 15 January 2011 19:48, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 15.01.2011 20:32, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
>>
>> Is this something I should ask here or at kernel-newbies ? :)
>
> I might not be able to help you regarding this topic, but I believe that
> you'll get a wall of "use C, god damnit" if you ask there :P
He
On 15 January 2011 19:32, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> echo " Run 'make oldconfig && make prepare' on kernel src to
> fix it."; \
Have you done this? It's required for building modules out of tree, iirc.
Henry
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc
On 15.01.2011 20:32, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
Is this something I should ask here or at kernel-newbies ? :)
I might not be able to help you regarding this topic, but I believe that
you'll get a wall of "use C, god damnit" if you ask there :P
Regards,
Sven
_
On 15 Jan 2011, at 20:40, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> insmod: error inserting 'kernel_pmodule.ko': -1 Unknown symbol in module
>
> and
>
> [16646.934537] kernel_pmodule: Unknown symbol unregister_chrdev
> [16646.934835] kernel_pmodule: Unknown symbol proc_root
> [16646.935174] kernel_pmodule: Unknow
Lukasz Sokol writes:
ah and sorry some clarifications :
- i posted using gmane web interface that forces me to wrap lines at 80 chars
manually
- what happens after: if I tell my system to
sudo insmod kernel_pmodule
results in
insmod: error inserting 'kernel_pmodule.ko': -1 Unknown symbol in mo
Hi,
http://wiki.freepascal.org/linux/kernel/module_development has some
information, unfortunately after copy-pasting into relevant files,
and running
make
i get
fpc kernel_module
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.4.0-2 [2010/03/06] for i386
Copyright (c) 1993-2009 by Florian Klaempfl
Target OS:
On 15 January 2011 17:52, Frank Church wrote:
>
> Is there a FCL library that can be used to convert a large integer into
> base64 format?
Do you know about the base64 unit?
Henry
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists
On Saturday, January 15, 2011 18:52 Frank Church wrote:
> Is there a FCL library that can be used to convert a large integer into
> base64 format?
Define "large integer" ... in case you mean a normal integer/int64:
IntToHex(...);
--
Best Regards,
Andreas
__
Is there a FCL library that can be used to convert a large integer into
base64 format?
--
Frank Church
===
http://devblog.brahmancreations.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/m
On 01/15/11 11:01, Andrew Haines wrote:
> On 01/15/11 10:30, Andrew Haines wrote:
>> On 01/14/11 14:38, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
>>> Hi List.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to jump a couple of levels in the inherited hierarchy
>>> when calling "inherited" on a method?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I *think* I've
On 01/15/11 10:30, Andrew Haines wrote:
> On 01/14/11 14:38, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
>> Hi List.
>>
>> Is it possible to jump a couple of levels in the inherited hierarchy
>> when calling "inherited" on a method?
>>
>>
>
> I *think* I've done this before this way but test it to make sure
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Andrew Haines wrote:
> On 01/14/11 14:38, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
> > Hi List.
> >
> > Is it possible to jump a couple of levels in the inherited hierarchy
> > when calling "inherited" on a method?
> >
> > A small example of what i'm trying to achieve be
does inherited inherited work ?
as in
procedure TD.DoSomething;
Begin
Inherited Inherited DoOtherthing;
End;
2011/1/15 Andrew Haines :
> On 01/14/11 14:38, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
>> Hi List.
>>
>> Is it possible to jump a couple of levels in the inherited hierarchy
>> when calling "
On 01/14/11 14:38, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> Is it possible to jump a couple of levels in the inherited hierarchy
> when calling "inherited" on a method?
>
> A small example of what i'm trying to achieve below (and don't mind the
> incomplete TB class implementation).
>
>
On 15/01/2011 11:09, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
Is it possible to jump a couple of levels in the inherited
hierarchy when calling "inherited" on a method?
Hmm, don't know whether you're the same person or not :), but I
replied in a stackoverflow question the next day after it w
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Torsten Bonde Christiansen
wrote:
> On 2011-01-14 23:05, Max Vlasov wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Torsten Bonde Christiansen <
> t...@epidata.dk> wrote:
>
>> Hi List.
>>
>> Is it possible to jump a couple of levels in the inherited hierarchy wh
On 2011-01-14 23:05, Max Vlasov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Torsten Bonde Christiansen
mailto:t...@epidata.dk>> wrote:
Hi List.
Is it possible to jump a couple of levels in the inherited
hierarchy when calling "inherited" on a method?
Hmm, don't know whether you'r
35 matches
Mail list logo
