06.01.2011 23:25, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
So, the natural next question: is there some construct similar to the
Supports() function, that avoids this problem? That is, something that
No.
detects that class TB supports both IA and IB interfaces, even though
it's declared only as "TB = class(T
Paul Ishenin wrote:
> 06.01.2011 20:14, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
>> return true. After all, TB is forced to implement methods of both IA and
>> IB, as IB descends from IA. But to my surprise, Supports(TB, IA) returns
>> false.
> This is expected behavior. It works the same way as in delphi.
>
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Howard Page-Clark wrote:
On 06/1/11 2:49, Gene Buckle wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, leledumbo wrote:
If you want something fast, pyacc and plex distributed with fpc can be an
option. But I suggest writing your own since that way you'll have a full
control of its features.
On 06/1/11 2:49, Gene Buckle wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, leledumbo wrote:
If you want something fast, pyacc and plex distributed with fpc can be an
option. But I suggest writing your own since that way you'll have a full
control of its features.
Is there an fpc version of TIniFile?
g.
look
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, leledumbo wrote:
If you want something fast, pyacc and plex distributed with fpc can be an
option. But I suggest writing your own since that way you'll have a full
control of its features.
Is there an fpc version of TIniFile?
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www
06.01.2011 20:14, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
return true. After all, TB is forced to implement methods of both IA and
IB, as IB descends from IA. But to my surprise, Supports(TB, IA) returns
false.
Changing the declaration to
TB = class(TInterfacedObject, IA, IB) end;
workarounds the proble
Hi,
Consider the attached source code. I have a base interface (IA) and a
descendant interface (IB). Class TB is declared as
TB = class(TInterfacedObject, IB) end;
Now I would expect that both
Supports(TB, IA)
Supports(TB, IB)
return true. After all, TB is forced to implement methods of
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> What FPC did you use? Just a plain arm compiler with an eabi rtl?
Software floating point should be activated too, because most phones
have no FPU.
> I thought 2.3 support now native apps using the android user interface?
It is getting c
