2010/11/26 Birger Jansen :
>> I'll see if I can find the missing cmp.exe in 64 bit version or try with the
>> 32
>> bit version.
>
> Copying the cmp.exe that comes with the Lazarus 32 bit installer to a 64 bit
> installation worked.
> Can this file be included in the 64 bit installer to prevent n
> I'll see if I can find the missing cmp.exe in 64 bit version or try with the
> 32
> bit version.
Copying the cmp.exe that comes with the Lazarus 32 bit installer to a 64 bit
installation worked.
Can this file be included in the 64 bit installer to prevent nono's like me
running into the same
> -Message d'origine-
> De : fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org [mailto:fpc-pascal-
> boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de Birger Jansen
> Envoyé : vendredi 26 novembre 2010 14:13
> À : fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Objet : RE: [fpc-pascal] Building FPC trunk on XP win64
>
> > make[3]: Leaving directory `E:/FPC/lazarus/fpc/trunk/compiler'
> > __missing_command_CMP -i218 ppc3.exe ppcx64.exe
> > process_begin: CreateProcess((null), __missing_command_CMP -i218 ppc3.exe
> > ppcx64
> > .exe, ...) failed.
>
> Yes - this means that you don't have GNU tool called "cmp" in t
On Thu, November 25, 2010 12:17, Birger Jansen wrote:
>> Well, bash is probably the problem. FPC doesn't provide bash, so somehow
>> unix utilities from some other set were used (cygwin,mingw) and they
>> complain that they don't run in their own environment.
>>
>> To test this, sanitize your PATH
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 26 Nov 2010, at 10:38, Max Vlasov wrote:
>
> - Is everything is ok with "steps to reproduce" field in fpc bugtracker?
>> It
>> never show at the issue view. Hope it saves and and at least the
>> developers
>> are seeing it.
>>
>
> You ca
> It should cause an exception everywhere by default (it does on PowerPC
> 32 bit). You have to use math.setexceptionmask if you want to mask
> exceptions for invalid floating point operations:
> http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/math/setexceptionmask.html
Thanks, that fixed my problem.
On 26 Nov 2010, at 10:38, Max Vlasov wrote:
- Is everything is ok with "steps to reproduce" field in fpc
bugtracker? It
never show at the issue view. Hope it saves and and at least the
developers
are seeing it.
You can see it by clicking on "view advanced" in the top right corner
when l
2010/11/26 Max Vlasov :
> Hi,
>
> I have two questions:
> - Is everything is ok with "steps to reproduce" field in fpc bugtracker? It
> never show at the issue view. Hope it saves and and at least the developers
> are seeing it.
It is visible in the advanced view, not in the simple view.
Vincent
Hi,
don't know where is the best place to ask about the bugtracker and mantis.
Please let me know.
I have two questions:
- Is everything is ok with "steps to reproduce" field in fpc bugtracker? It
never show at the issue view. Hope it saves and and at least the developers
are seeing it.
- Google
On 26 Nov 2010, at 09:48, Birger Jansen wrote:
I encounter a strange difference in the behaviour of NaN values
between windows 32 and 64 bit. Have a look at the following program:
---
program NanExample;
uses
math;
var
a, b, c: Double;
begin
a := 0.0/0.0;
b := 0.0/
I encounter a strange difference in the behaviour of NaN values between windows
32 and 64 bit. Have a look at the following program:
---
program NanExample;
uses
math;
var
a, b, c: Double;
begin
a := 0.0/0.0;
b := 0.0/0.0;
c := max(a,b);
if IsNan(c) then
Wri
12 matches
Mail list logo
