On 03.09.2010 18:02, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Second, does FPC understand "tail recursion"?
Depends on version, do
fpc -i |grep -i tailrec
to find out more.
O.o
Ok... now I'm officially impressed.
Maybe it's time to reuse some of my OCaml knowledge from the 3rd term of
my study :D
R
In our previous episode, Bihar Anwar said:
> O Marco, I love you :-)
Better love Florian :-)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
O Marco, I love you :-)
- Original Message
From: Marco van de Voort
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
Sent: Fri, September 3, 2010 11:02:52 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Recursion optimization by compiler
> Second, does FPC understand "tail recursion"?
Depends on version, do
fpc -i
> Second, does FPC understand "tail recursion"?
Depends on version, do
fpc -i |grep -i tailrec
to find out more.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Hello FPC-Pascal,
Friday, September 3, 2010, 3:06:30 PM, you wrote:
BA> First, just curious, have somebody here ever benchmark performance between
BA> native stack and regular RAM as a stack?
Stack is RAM, so the only difference is in the algorithm used.
--
Best regards,
José
___
September 3, 2010 7:17:57 PM, José Mejuto wrote:
> That kind of "optimization" to me only seems interesting in
> two possible situations, when calling functions is high
> costly or when there is a very limited stack amount (really,
> really small). From my point of view if you need more that
> 1M
Dear community,
I'm trying to write console program using thread but
have several problems.
I have already posted them to Lazarus forum:
1)
http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,10403.0.html - Threads
not working
2)
http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,10399.0.ht
Hello FPC-Pascal,
Friday, September 3, 2010, 1:12:31 PM, you wrote:
BA> After my previous post, "TreeView and Nonrecursion", I'd tried to ask the
same
BA> topics in stackoverflow.com
BA>
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3630047/treeview-control-and-nonrecursion)
BA> and I got something new.
After my previous post, "TreeView and Nonrecursion", I'd tried to ask the same
topics in stackoverflow.com
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3630047/treeview-control-and-nonrecursion)
and I got something new.
It is possible to recurse without using up the stack space. Optimizing
compilers
