Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc tag syntax question

Op 2010-08-10 14:37, Michael Van Canneyt het geskryf: > > In one package, . should be enough in the description > text. > > In 'short' tags, however, something goes wrong when creating TOC pages that > use this tag, and the resolving goes wrong; so there > #.. > is needed. I can confirm that

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc tag syntax question

On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Hi, I read the fpdoc documentation, and think I understand it correctly, but would just like to confirm. For fpGUI's class documentation, it uses a single 'fpgui' package in the fpdoc command line, covering all the units documented. When one XML

[fpc-pascal] fpdoc tag syntax question

Hi, I read the fpdoc documentation, and think I understand it correctly, but would just like to confirm. For fpGUI's class documentation, it uses a single 'fpgui' package in the fpdoc command line, covering all the units documented. When one XML description file references another description fi

Re: [fpc-pascal] windows 32bit cross to 64 ?

Hi guys, I took the liberty to add the summary of this thread to the following wiki page. http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Cross_compiling#Win32_To_Win64 Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lis