OK guys, after contemplating all your suggestions, I decide to follow the
SynEdit way, that is, synregexpr unit. I suppose this unit tends to get more
maintenance in the future.
Concerning the C++ PCRE library, it is the most full-featured reg-expr
implementation, but calling C++ functions from
On 06 Jun 2010, at 23:23, Thierry Bothorel wrote:
> I started with Mathiew Mead JNI headers translation for Delphi/Kylix,
> that explains libc use. I did not found any JNI headers translation for
> Freepascal. Does this mean that the only solution is to update
> JNI.pas so that it uses Unix u
Jonas Maebe a écrit :
> That package only works under Linux/i386, because it is only intended as a
> replacement for the Kylix libc unit. It cannot and will never work on any
> other platform. It is also not compiled by the Makefile for Linux/ARM. So it
> is normal that if you circumvent the mak
On 06 Jun 2010, at 17:38, Thierry Bothorel wrote:
> I have errors in ...fpsrc/2.5.1/packages/libc/
That package only works under Linux/i386, because it is only intended as a
replacement for the Kylix libc unit. It cannot and will never work on any other
platform. It is also not compiled by
Marco van de Voort a écrit :
> In our previous episode, Thierry Bothorel said:
>
>> After googling I did not found clear answers, but my understanding is
>> that it is not possible to build natives libraries for Android without
>> writing a completely new libc translation for bionic ?
>>
>
Hello FPC-Pascal,
Friday, June 4, 2010, 2:50:24 PM, you wrote:
>> JM> Maybe you are executing Pascal code in threads that have not been
[...]
>> Not, well, not at least on intention but maybe is the XPCOM which is
>> If that's the case is any kind of workaround ?
JM> No, it cannot be worked aroun
On 6-6-2010 19:06, Jim wrote:
> On 6-6-2010 16:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
>>> (gdb) break fpc_raiseexception
>>> Breakpoint 1 at 0x40a9c6
>>> .. debug output
>>> Breakpoint 1, 0x0040a9c6 in fpc_raiseexception ()
>>> (gdb) backtrace
>>> #0 0x0040a
On 6-6-2010 16:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
>> (gdb) break fpc_raiseexception
>> Breakpoint 1 at 0x40a9c6
>> .. debug output
>> Breakpoint 1, 0x0040a9c6 in fpc_raiseexception ()
>> (gdb) backtrace
>> #0 0x0040a9c6 in fpc_raiseexception ()
>> #1 0x0
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
(gdb) break fpc_raiseexception
Breakpoint 1 at 0x40a9c6
.. debug output
Breakpoint 1, 0x0040a9c6 in fpc_raiseexception ()
(gdb) backtrace
#0 0x0040a9c6 in fpc_raiseexception ()
#1 0x0043d284 in
IBCONNECTION_TIBCONNECTION_$__CHECKERROR$ANSISTRING$PISC_STA
On 5-6-2010 10:47, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> It might be worth putting all parameters in a record definition and pass
> the
> record to your function. That makes the procedure declaration somewhat more
> manageable and understandable. (and definitely more efficent as well).
Progress!
As you su
http://delphi.about.com/od/toppicks/tp/delphi-regular-expressions.htm
The regex unit in SynEdit is an old version of the code from
regexpstudio.com (which seems to be offline) is said to be very slow
for processing large sets of data, like a whole file. In SynEdit it`s
used to process single lines
Hi
> Speed is important to me, but reg-expr features is important as well.
> Actually, I want to include reg-expr as an alternative search mode in
> my general-purpose file search unit.
Then the SynEdit's version of regexp should be fast enough.
SynEdit editor in Lazarus for example uses it and i
In our previous episode, Thierry Bothorel said:
>
> After googling I did not found clear answers, but my understanding is
> that it is not possible to build natives libraries for Android without
> writing a completely new libc translation for bionic ?
I don't fully understand. libc's are not tran
On 6-6-2010 11:54, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> Maybe there is some special handling required for firebird exceptions,
> although that would surprise me. Normally I'd simply expect this to
> be a special error code, and the message of the exception as the error
> message...
>
> Michael.
Found a pd
On 6-6-2010 11:54, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
>> On 5-6-2010 12:23, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
On 5-6-2010 10:47, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
>
> Is the firebird UDF written in fpc ?
On June 6, 2010 3:06:06 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> I have looked into this as well, about 2 months ago. From my initial
> research it seems the regex unit included with FCL is not as
> feature-complete as the one in SynEdit.
On June 6, 2010 3:54:53 PM, Juha Manninen wrote:
>I also chose SynEdi
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
On 5-6-2010 12:23, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
On 5-6-2010 10:47, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0001ad7d in FINALIZE$_DATEUTILS ()
(gdb)
Hi,
Just a couple of questions. I wanted to play with android native
development kit to see if I can replace the basic C "hello world"
library from NDK samples with a fpc one. After "fighting" with cross
compile, JNI headers, i'm stuck now with Android libc implementation
(bionic).
After googl
Hi!
Am 04.06.2010 18:55, schrieb Andreas Berger:
I have a stable cgi program running in windows (no libraries - simple
writeln). However, our web host is in linux. Is there a simple way for
me to cross-compile the app? or is it easier to learn how to use linux
and do it there? I saw a page how t
On 5-6-2010 12:23, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
>> On 5-6-2010 10:47, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Jim wrote:
>>
>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> 0x0001ad7d in FINALIZE$_DATEUTILS ()
>> (gdb) backtrace
>> #0 0x
I also chose SynEdit for Lazarus Delphi converter for some reason. (I think it
was the first hit when searching "regexp" from Lazarus code base).
It works well.
I would guess the other choices work well, too.
About the speed difference: I don't believe there is any huge difference.
Please remembe
On 05/06/2010, Bihar Anwar wrote:
> I've search fpc mailing list about this matter, I found they were discussed
> a long time ago (2006), and I still didn't have a conclusion about which one
I have looked into this as well, about 2 months ago. From my initial
research it seems the regex unit inclu
22 matches
Mail list logo
