>> Do i need to explicitely name self as param?
self is a reserved keyword which represents the reference to the object of
context (much the same as using "result" in a function) - it is understood by
the compiler and does not need to be specified.
>> Is self actually a pointer? If yes, do I nee
I'm no expert so these answers may be a bit off, but I figure any help is nice
during US business hours...
> Are there somewhere more or less pedagogic examples of class code?
I've never found any. I've learned largely by studying (and occasionally
fixing)
fpgui code.
> *self*
> Do i need to
Hello,
I'm trying to transform a manually implemented type, with pseudo-method as
funcs/procs, into an fpc "class" type; and facing numerous issue: namely 3
whole pages of compiler errors ;-).
Are there somewhere more or less pedagogic examples of class code?
*self*
Do i need to explicitely nam
Hello FPC-Pascal,
Friday, May 14, 2010, 1:34:08 PM, you wrote:
JAGdFJ> i am able to receive packets setting up a tap device with a
fixed ip
JAGdFJ> and doing ping to the gateway address...
JAGdFJ> now i need to decipher the ioctl calls...
Sorry, I can not help more, I had never used TAP and even
Uses
Windows,
Classes,
BlckSock;
Const
TAP_Device = '\\.\Global\{44F7688F-77FA-43DC-8D8F-9CBA23E01BB0}.tap'#00;
TAP_Buffer = 8192;
Var
Handle : Integer;
Buffer : Pointer;
Stream : THandleStream;
Count : Integer;
Beg
On Fri, 14 May 2010, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 14 May 2010, at 09:51, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
If fcl-json is feature complete, then I don't mind emailing the JSON
website myself, that is not an issue at all.
What is feature complete ?
I sup
On 14 May 2010, at 09:51, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Fri, 14 May 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
>> If fcl-json is feature complete, then I don't mind emailing the JSON
>> website myself, that is not an issue at all.
>
> What is feature complete ?
I suppose supporting everything defined
On Fri, 14 May 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 14 May 2010 09:48, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I guess because the 'weight' of a developer is higher than
the weight of a user :-)
That too. :)
So Michael, as a FPC team member, would you mind doing the honors. You
probably know a lot more a
On 14 May 2010 09:48, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> I guess because the 'weight' of a developer is higher than
> the weight of a user :-)
That too. :)
So Michael, as a FPC team member, would you mind doing the honors. You
probably know a lot more about fcl-json that I do (I never used it
before)
On Fri, 14 May 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 14 May 2010 09:29, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Is there a reason why you can't do it yourself?
The reason I said somebody from the FPC team is because maybe there is
a "unknown to me" reason why fcl-jason is not listed on the JSON
website. I don't us
On 14 May 2010 09:29, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>
> Is there a reason why you can't do it yourself?
The reason I said somebody from the FPC team is because maybe there is
a "unknown to me" reason why fcl-jason is not listed on the JSON
website. I don't use JSON (never have), so I don't know if it is
feat
On Fri, 14 May 2010, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 09:16, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Graeme,
Can somebody from the FPC team contact the JSON website
[http://www.json.org/] so that they can list Free Pascal Compiler's
fcl-json package under Delphi/Object Pascal section.
No need
On Fri, May 14, 2010 09:16, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Graeme,
> Can somebody from the FPC team contact the JSON website
> [http://www.json.org/] so that they can list Free Pascal Compiler's
> fcl-json package under Delphi/Object Pascal section.
>
> No need to leave FPC out of the list - consid
Hi,
Can somebody from the FPC team contact the JSON website
[http://www.json.org/] so that they can list Free Pascal Compiler's
fcl-json package under Delphi/Object Pascal section.
No need to leave FPC out of the list - considering the other obscure names
in that list. We should promote FPC where
14 matches
Mail list logo
