Something like this one:
https://libxpl.arsoft.homeip.net/browser/trunk/errormap/xplErrorMap.cpp?rev=70
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
I mean, for example, are there something like:
- fpcError_ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND = ESysENOENT in UNIX
fpcError_ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND = ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND in Windows
- fpcERROR_FILENAME_EXCED_RANGE = ESysENAMETOOLONG in UNIX
fpcERROR_FILENAME_EXCED_RANGE = ERROR_FILENAME_EXCED_RANGE
As the title says. :-)
I mean
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
> This was me...
> Pierre Muller
Pierre, thanks so much for taking the time to look at and resolve this
bug. It's working beautifully now.
-SG
--
This email is fiction. Any resemblance to actual events
or persons living or dead is purely coincidental.
Seth Grover
sethdgrover[at]gmail[dot]com
__
ows7.
Regards
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5104 (20100511) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.free
On 11 May 2010, at 10:12, Technical wrote:
Another message is
"Argument can't be assigned to", despite being perfectly happy to be
assigned to in a previous installation.
See
http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_2.4.0#Treating_direct-mapped_properties_as_regular_fields
Jonas
___
Hello,
Which component package is that? Where did you get it from?
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Technical wrote:
> on three different computers without any previous history of Lazarus (2 are
> running XP, 1 is running Windows 7) I always get the same errors - "Can't
> find unit Unix"
Well,
On 10 May 2010, at 15:17, Pierre Muller wrote:
I just wanted to add that this bug is
most probably specific to the debug format used:
only the dwarf debug format generated information
that triggered that bug.
The reason that we generate such debug info for DWARF (namely encoding
"var" par
> -Message d'origine-
> De : fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org [mailto:fpc-pascal-
> boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de Seth Grover
> Envoyé : Monday, May 10, 2010 2:48 PM
> À : fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Objet : [fpc-pascal] annoying gdb bug fixed
>
> For those of yo
On Tue, 11 May 2010 08:52:38 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 10 May 2010, spir ☣ wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > Below two quotes from the ref manual:
> > [...]
> >
> >
> > I'm rather confused when reading this.
> > [...]
Thank you Thierry and Michael for your "enlighten
Thankyou, Felipe, for your comments concerning multiple versions of Lazarus.
I am now using only one (different) version on each computer.
This refers to your comments concerning the installation of component
packages into Lazarus/FPC.
They have been running OK once installed in Lazarus 0.9.26/F
On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:15:46 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> In that case the FPC documentation is wrong. Then could you correct the ref
> documentation please - Section 3.2.5. As quoted below, the docs say
> WideString is reference counted.
>
>
> --[ FPC 2.4 language reference doc ]--
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt het geskryf:
I am pretty sure it is the other way around, UnicodeString is the unicode
version of AnsiString and is thus reference counted. WideString is the
OLEstring compatible string, and is not reference counted.
Correct.
Michael Van Canneyt het geskryf:
>> I am pretty sure it is the other way around, UnicodeString is the unicode
>> version of AnsiString and is thus reference counted. WideString is the
>> OLEstring compatible string, and is not reference counted.
>
> Correct.
In that case the FPC documentation i
Vincent Snijders het geskryf:
>
> I am pretty sure it is the other way around, UnicodeString is the
> unicode version of AnsiString and is thus reference counted. WideString
> is the OLEstring compatible string, and is not reference counted.
My mistake... only made my first cup of coffee now.
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Luis Fernando Del Aguila Mejía het geskryf:
Why WideString is not equal to Unicodestring in Windows?
WideString is reference counted (for Windows COM reasons). UnicodeString is
pretty much the same as WideString, but
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Luis Fernando Del Aguila Mejía het geskryf:
Why WideString is not equal to Unicodestring in Windows?
WideString is reference counted (for Windows COM reasons). UnicodeString is
pretty much the same as WideString, but not reference counted.
I am pretty sure it is
17 matches
Mail list logo
