Lee Jenkins escreveu:
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Frank Church escreveu:
I am glad to see someone with an interest in FPCs XML. Do you have
some experience with XPath usage in PFC/Lazarus?
Luiz,
In Unit1.pas:
XPathResult := EvaluateXPathExpression('//Descricao',
XmlTree.Docume
Thank you very much Henry, David, and Vincent. I think, I must go back to the
basic of reference counting. Special thanks to David for the detail explanation.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.o
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Frank Church escreveu:
I am glad to see someone with an interest in FPCs XML. Do you have
some experience with XPath usage in PFC/Lazarus?
Luiz,
In Unit1.pas:
XPathResult := EvaluateXPathExpression('//Descricao', XmlTree.DocumentElement);
if (XPathR
Hi, you all.
At current TMaks.Matches does a case insensitive matching of a
filename against a given mask(list).
Currently this comparison is case insensitive ('ABC.doc' matches the
mask 'abc*').
This is OK for Windows/DOS environments, but it will not do for case
sensitive operating systems (or
On 28 Apr 2010, at 13:11, spir ☣ wrote:
It seems that once a pointer has been assigned nil, it needs to be
(re)allocated using new() before using it to (re)set its target:
You might want to read some tutorials on pointers before continuing
you experiments. See e.g.:
* http://lazarus-ccr.s
Hello,
It seems that once a pointer has been assigned nil, it needs to be
(re)allocated using new() before using it to (re)set its target:
...
p := nil; // pointer to Integer
...
new(p) ; p^ := 1;
Is this hypothesis correct?
Use case: Linked List
nil is used in the "toNext" field of a li
The funny thing is I have already read that wiki page, but did not
recognize it in your description.
When I added 'pascal' to the Google search, then it turned up on the
first page..
FreePascal users ought to blog some more. ;-)
On 27 April 2010 19:47, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
> Frank
On 28 April 2010 05:33, Bihar Anwar wrote:
> I've tried to use Move() instead of Copy(). Any objection with the following
> code?
>
> var
> a: array of string;
>
> SetLength(a, 5);
> a[0] := 'aa'; a[1] := 'bb'; a[2] := 'cc'; a[3] := 'dd'; a[4] := 'ee';
>
> System.Move(a[3], a[0], 2 * SizeOf(stri
On 28 Apr 2010, at 10:48, Jonas Maebe wrote:
{ now delete one of these elements }
finalise(a[4]);
{ and compact the array }
move(a[3],a[4],(length(a)-3)*sizeof(a[0]));
Well, actually:
move(a[5],a[4],(length(a)-5)*sizeof(a[0]));
Jonas
___
fpc-
Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Bihar Anwar schreef:
> > I've tried to use Move() instead of Copy(). Any objection with the following
> > code?
>
> Yes, at first glance without much thinking, I don't think it is safe. Did you
> think through the consequences of copying reference counted types (ansistrin
On 28 Apr 2010, at 09:26, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Good idea. Are all possible constructs in FPC in the testsuite ?
Probably not, but a lot of them are.
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.o
On 28 Apr 2010, at 08:05, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
I am not sure whether this now cast in stone forever. Errors *can*
be corrected sometimes. ;-)
The behaviour of dynamic arrays will not be changed. At best, one day
we may add GPC-compatible array schema types (see http://www.gnu-pascal.d
On 28 April 2010 04:24, Bihar Anwar wrote:
> Ok, I'll try to observe the compiled code using debugger and benchmark it if
> needed. BTW, what do you mean by allocating memory directly? Is there another
> way to allocate memory for dynamic array besides using SetLength()?
I meant using allocmem,
In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said:
> > I created a VERY small test sample in utils/fpdoc, it tests 'strange'
> > cases. It would indeed be a good idea to create a testsuite in
> > fcl-passrc itself.
>
> Wouldn't it be enough just to let it scan/parse the whole fpc test suite :)?
That
Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> Where are "the usage, internals and purpose of dyn. arrays" documented?
I dunno. But I find them incredibly useful.
they have some quirks, and over the years I've been using dynarrays, I've
documented these on my own computer -- I even have a dynamic array test program
In our previous episode, Anthony Walter said:
> "Technical limitations aside, at this point what would be needed from the
> community to get the generic syntax changed?:
>
> : Patches.
>
> I believe there would first need to be some sort ofg consensus within the
> community about the changing the
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
As soon as I get around to some bugfixing, I'll have a look at these.
Shouldn't we create some testsuite for fcl-
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
>> In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
>>>
>>> As soon as I get around to some bugfixing, I'll have a look at these.
>>
>> Shouldn't we create some testsuite for fcl-passrc? (or have a flag in the
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
As soon as I get around to some bugfixing, I'll have a look at these.
Shouldn't we create some testsuite for fcl-passrc? (or have a flag in the
existing testsuite to exclude tests from fcl-pas
19 matches
Mail list logo
