Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Michalis Kamburelis
Hans-Peter Suter wrote: > > PS: thanks also to the other suggestions! And if somebody uses Emacs I > am still interested to hear about how it goes. Thanks again! I use Emacs most of the time to edit my Pascal (and all other :) ) code. But it has it's learning curve. And, although there are variou

Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Robert Wolfe
Ingemar Ragnemalm wrote: Hans-Peter Suter wrote: I'm on a mac and use TextMate currently. As it doesn't jump between declaration and implementation and ist mac-only, I am looking for a replacement. Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC? I don't quite understand the question.

Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Ingemar Ragnemalm
Hans-Peter Suter wrote: I'm on a mac and use TextMate currently. As it doesn't jump between declaration and implementation and ist mac-only, I am looking for a replacement. Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC? I don't quite understand the question. Why is "Mac only" a prob

Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
2010/1/10 dmitry boyarintsev : > > I use it, even if develop non-LCL based applications. Same here, but I probably use Lazarus IDE to develop 99.9% of my work - which is all non-LCL related projects. Actually thinking about it, the only LCL project I sometimes work on is implementing minor fixes f

Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
2010/1/10 Paul Ishenin : > Marco van de Voort wrote: >> >> I don't use Lazarus for FPC development. This is not a problem of Lazarus, >> but more that I don't want to often rebuild lazarus when I'm working on >> FPC. >> > > Why do you need to rebuild lazarus when you are working on fpc? I second t

Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Hans-Peter Suter
2010/1/10 dmitry boyarintsev : > I use Lazarus as my primary IDE (i have to use Delphi in windows sometimes). > Lazarus is the only IDE i'm using on Mac OS X. Just installed Lazarus and it's much better than I expected. Simple things like 'navigating around' are great. Didn't (yet) debug and still

Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Juha Manninen
Yes, and I am using the devel version of FPC (2.5.1). It works fine for building the whole Lazarus. Juha ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Juha Manninen
On sunnuntai, 10. tammikuuta 2010 16:04:09 dmitry boyarintsev wrote: > I use Lazarus as my primary IDE (i have to use Delphi in windows > sometimes). Lazarus is the only IDE i'm using on Mac OS X. > > I use it, even if develop non-LCL based applications. > The best option Lazarus has to offer is

Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Paul Ishenin
Marco van de Voort wrote: I don't use Lazarus for FPC development. This is not a problem of Lazarus, but more that I don't want to often rebuild lazarus when I'm working on FPC. Why do you need to rebuild lazarus when you are working on fpc? Btw, I use lazarus for fpc development. This is ve

Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread dmitry boyarintsev
I use Lazarus as my primary IDE (i have to use Delphi in windows sometimes). Lazarus is the only IDE i'm using on Mac OS X. I use it, even if develop non-LCL based applications. The best option Lazarus has to offer is Codetools, not available in other environments thanks, dmitry _

Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said: > > In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said: > >> Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC? > > > > Maybe, but what would you use as editor? :_) > > ;-) > > What do you (and/or the other FreePascal authors) use? joe for small editi

Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Hans-Peter Suter
2010/1/10 Marco van de Voort : > In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said: >> Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC? > > Maybe, but what would you use as editor? :_) ;-) What do you (and/or the other FreePascal authors) use? Cheers, Hans-Peter _

Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Holger Bruns
Marco van de Voort schrieb: In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said: Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC? Maybe, but what would you use as editor? :_) ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://l

Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said: > Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC? Maybe, but what would you use as editor? :_) ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/f

[fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?

2010-01-10 Thread Hans-Peter Suter
I'm on a mac and use TextMate currently. As it doesn't jump between declaration and implementation and ist mac-only, I am looking for a replacement. Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC? Thanks, Hans-Peter ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-p