On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:58:10 +0100
Reimar Grabowski wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:39:45 +0100
> Lukas Gradl wrote:
>
> > I'm not shure about that as I'm not that good at C. The packed record
> > works at 32bit -so I thought that should be correct.
> If it works on 32bit it should be correct.
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:39:45 +0100
Lukas Gradl wrote:
> I'm not shure about that as I'm not that good at C. The packed record
> works at 32bit -so I thought that should be correct.
If it works on 32bit it should be correct.
> Is there a difference between 64Bit and 32Bit?
Yes.
Some types have d
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
You must never use a "packed" record for a C record, unless it is
declared in C using __attribute__((__packed__)). The fact that it worked
in 32 bit was pure coincidence. You also have to add {$packrecords c} to
your source file to tell the compiler to lay out records the
On 18 Dec 2009, at 13:39, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> rMonitor=packed record
...
end;
rMonitorEx=packed record
dwMonitorSize:DWORD;
Monitor:rMonitor;
end;
Are you sure the C record is packed too ? This would mean that all
function pointers in rMonitor are not aligned.
I'm not shure ab
> rMonitor=packed record
...
end;
rMonitorEx=packed record
dwMonitorSize:DWORD;
Monitor:rMonitor;
end;
Are you sure the C record is packed too ? This would mean that all
function pointers in rMonitor are not aligned.
I'm not shure about that as I'm not that good at C. The p
Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
> The most important thing now is that (at least) one
> person actually starts *coding* and making his source available. Where is not
> that
> important.
I agree 100%.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http:/
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
I really don't care
where projects are created - I think SourceForge or GitHub are more visible
and accessible by all. So that would be my first choice anyway.
I really don't care either. The most important thing now is that (at least) one
person actually starts *co
