Re: [fpc-pascal] remote debugging using gdbserver

2009-12-13 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 13 Dec 2009, at 13:51, ik wrote: > When I debug it internally on the device, gdb gives me a backtrace properly > and few other functions, however when i use gdbserver like so: > $ gdbserver 192.168.0.202: ./hello > > And try to debug it using: > > gdb# targer remote 192.168.0.202: ./

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote: Time? I believe I could make a basic forum application within a few days, in my spare time, using ExtPascal. But I myself don't think ExtPascal would be the correct tool to be used since it creates a non search engine friendly application (because of Aj

[fpc-pascal] remote debugging using gdbserver

2009-12-13 Thread ik
Hello, I'm trying to use gdbserver to remotely debug a program written in fpc using the following parameters: $ ppcrossarm -dDEBUG -godwarfsets -godwarfmethodclassprefix -gw2 -gw3 -gl -g -gs -O- -gostabsabsincludes -godwarfmethodclassprefix hello.pas When I debug it internally on the device, gdb

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 13 Dec 2009, at 12:51, Marco van de Voort wrote: > I'm all for merging, if only to get the standaard phpbb possibility to get a > list of new msgs. FWIW, you can also do that with the current community forum: log in, go to a forum's main page, and click at the bottom on "klik hier om een ken

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Bee Jay
Time? I believe I could make a basic forum application within a few days, in my spare time, using ExtPascal. But I myself don't think ExtPascal would be the correct tool to be used since it creates a non search engine friendly application (because of Ajax). I think fpWeb would be the bes

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Bee Jay
if someone appear with the native pascal forum solution we will create a site based on it and merge everything there :) Is there someone out there had done this (pascal forum)? AFAIK, I only knew one: Powtils forum (which is now closed). Honestly, I never used fpWeb because I was a Powtils

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Paul Ishenin
Florian Klaempfl wrote: Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or ExtPascal)? Time? So not to loose our time we can merge to the lazarus forum first and then if someone appear with the native pascal forum solution we will create a site based on it and merge

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Bee Jay wrote: > Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or > ExtPascal)? I think this is separate from what I proposed. We can do the merger now into the Lazarus forum, and when this pascal forum becomes as good as the Lazarus forum en

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Rainer Stratmann
Am Sunday 13 December 2009 13:08:08 schrieb Florian Klaempfl: > Bee Jay schrieb: > >> We have already merged the wikis, what about merging the forums? > >> I would propose merging into the Lazarus forum. > > > > Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or > > ExtPascal)?

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Bee Jay schrieb: >> We have already merged the wikis, what about merging the forums? >> I would propose merging into the Lazarus forum. > > Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or > ExtPascal)? Time? ___ fpc-pascal mailli

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Rainer Stratmann
Am Sunday 13 December 2009 12:53:03 schrieb Bee Jay: > > Then it would be possible to make a userfriendly forum and to add > > useful > > functions. > > Of course, since we have all the source code that we are fluent at. :D > Another thing is... it could also be a test suite for fpWeb both on > per

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Bee Jay
Then it would be possible to make a userfriendly forum and to add useful functions. Of course, since we have all the source code that we are fluent at. :D Another thing is... it could also be a test suite for fpWeb both on performance and maintenance which both usually become main consid

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Paul Ishenin said: > > Fine with me but is there a tool to merge the community site into the > > forum software used by lazarus? > > > How the community site is built? Does it uses own made engine or some > well known? Some netscape application server thingy iirc. Dani

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Rainer Stratmann
Am Sunday 13 December 2009 12:36:10 schrieb Bee Jay: > > We have already merged the wikis, what about merging the forums? > > I would propose merging into the Lazarus forum. > > Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or > ExtPascal)? Specially dedicated for FPC and Laza

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Bee Jay
We have already merged the wikis, what about merging the forums? I would propose merging into the Lazarus forum. Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or ExtPascal)? Specially dedicated for FPC and Lazarus users. It can be a showcase that pascal (FPC/Lazarus in

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Paul Ishenin
Florian Klaempfl wrote: Fine with me but is there a tool to merge the community site into the forum software used by lazarus? How the community site is built? Does it uses own made engine or some well known? Best regards, Paul Ishenin. ___ fpc-pas

Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger

2009-12-13 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb: > Hello, > > I've noticed that few people use the FPC Forum and questions often > stay months without answer. I would answer more questions, but > monitoring 2 forums is too much work. We have already merged the > wikis, what about merging the forums? I would p