Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] Is this an error ?

2009-10-03 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 02 Oct 2009, at 12:48, JoshyFun wrote: That's exactly my supposition, the problem raises as the quotient should never be negative, but due unexpected flow, it takes a -1 value instead zero (already fixed) but no problem in 32 bits using integer and DWORD instead int64 and QWORD. In the othe

Re: [fpc-pascal] list working again?

2009-10-03 Thread Vincent Snijders
David Emerson schreef: my last couple messages bounced, and I haven't received many messages lately... until tonight. Was the listserver down, and is it back up now? It was down some parts of Thursday and Friday. Vincent ___ fpc-pascal maillist -

Re: [fpc-pascal] multiple inheritence

2009-10-03 Thread Micha Nelissen
David Emerson wrote: lists containing the same elements: one sorted, one unsorted. The reason to have both: sorted -> fast search; unsorted -> sequential navigation through the list while elements are being added. It's not as if combining those gives you the best of both worlds ... if the sor

Re: [fpc-pascal] multiple inheritence

2009-10-03 Thread dmitry boyarintsev
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:24 AM, David Emerson wrote: > I'd like to create a "double-list" type, which maintains two parallel > lists containing the same elements: one sorted, one unsorted. The > reason to have both: sorted -> fast search; unsorted -> sequential > navigation through the list while

Re: [fpc-pascal] TUN/TAP

2009-10-03 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior ha escrit: Opening the TUN/TAP (/dev/net/tun) without the ioctl call is not doing the job, but i dont know how to do this with pascal equivalent code... There's an fpioctl function in freepascal (never used it though): http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/b

[fpc-pascal] multiple inheritence

2009-10-03 Thread David Emerson
Hi all, I've been reading about multiple inheritance in the list archives, and from what I gather, it is only supported through a combination of "interfaces" and classes; one cannot inherit from two classes. As far as I can tell, interface types do not allow implemented virtual methods -- only