Re: [fpc-pascal] TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer is wrongly implemented

2009-08-29 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said: > > (don't worry, not based on Delphi implementation) that I can donate to > > FPC. I just need confirmation that the current implementation in FPC is > > incorrect though. > > If you have a better for unix this will be fine. IIRC it is not easy (if

Re: [fpc-pascal] TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer is wrongly implemented

2009-08-29 Thread Vinzent Höfler
Florian Klaempfl : > If you have a better for unix this will be fine. IIRC it is not easy (if > possible after all?) to implement TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer > for unix systems. It's possible, yes. If it's possible in an efficient way, is another question. Vinzent. -- GRATIS für alle

Re: [fpc-pascal] TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer is wrongly implemented

2009-08-29 Thread Vinzent Höfler
Graeme Geldenhuys : > I have a corrected TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer implementation > (don't worry, not based on Delphi implementation) that I can donate to > FPC. I hope it isn't based on the Delphi one. Last time I heard the Delphi implementation suffers from occasional dead locks. S