Amir
I did use Application.Terminate, but it only 'suspends' the App; The full
screen stays on the background, and the process appears to reamin in memory.
why don't you use "Application.Terminate;"?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Does-Anybody-Know-how-to-REALLY-kill
why don't you use "Application.Terminate;"?
On 08/23/2009 04:21 PM, epergola wrote:
Thanks Henry.
But my main form is full screen: no title bar, no task bar.
I have a custom'Terminate' button that on click does this:
MainForm.Close.
I want the form to be closed (NOT appearing on the background)
Thanks Henry.
But my main form is full screen: no title bar, no task bar.
I have a custom'Terminate' button that on click does this:
MainForm.Close.
I want the form to be closed (NOT appearing on the background), and the
Application
actually terminated 'destroyed' or 'killed'.
On the page you ref
2009/8/23 epergola :
>
> Hi
>
> I have done a lot of research but couldn't find a solution.
> I have an app that runs on a PDA and takes (must take) the whole screen.
> When the user presses the Terminate button, the main window of the
> app remains visible (and I read the app actually remains in m
Hi
I have done a lot of research but couldn't find a solution.
I have an app that runs on a PDA and takes (must take) the whole screen.
When the user presses the Terminate button, the main window of the
app remains visible (and I read the app actually remains in memory).
Is it possible to really
Am Freitag, den 21.08.2009, 12:50 +0800 schrieb yu ping:
> I just download the newest Lazarus which has a newer fpc compiler
> 2.31version,
> but I can't find the "what's new" document, then What's the difference
> between fpc224 and fpc231?
And 2.3.1 does have support for embedded devices!
Look
In our previous episode, Joao Morais said:
> The following patch fixes a bug in the TCustomApplication class.
> Against fixes_2_2, sorry.
Committed to trunk (r13586). Please use the bugtracker as much as possible
in the future. It makes it really easier for us to track and distribute
bugs.
_
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> 2009/8/21 yu ping :
> > What's the difference
> > between fpc224 and fpc231?
>
> A simpler answer is that 2.2.4 is the stable branch. And fpc 2.3.1 is
> the unstable development branch.
Not anymore. We are just past the branchpoint of 2.3.1. 2.5
On 08/21/2009 08:31 PM, Žilvinas Ledas wrote:
Yes, i'ts so frustrating when you can't write solutions in ACM using
your best known programming language...
Yeah, that sucks, I know. My guess is that since ACM is sponsored by
IBM, they want to push their Eclipse and Java crap and Pascal just
si
