So, supporting open source should be the safest choice for
them. If M$ grows bigger, they can grow bigger with M$. If M$ goes down,
they can still grow bigger with other platforms (linux, mac, etc).
Many years ago (when Borland was still a real competitor of M$) Borland
had problems to create
> What must I write there?
The path to your rtl and packages (just copy it from your fpc.cfg), i.e.:
/usr/lib/fpc/2.X.X/rtl
/usr/lib/fpc/2.X.X/packages/*
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cannot-find-GTK-tp20905508p20929531.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing
Vincent Snijders writes:
Oops, wrong link, I meant:
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/fpcdoc/rtl/index-8.html
Thanks. That will be very helpfull.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinf
I found the problem for the the wrong time.
I checked /etc/localtime and this was ok, but there was also a file
/etc/timezone with a wrong entry !
fpc seems to first checks the /etc/timezone and then /etc/localtime
Kylix, and also all other programs i've tested do it in the different order!
b
Francisco Reyes schreef:
Vincent Snijders writes:
e.g. http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/fpcdoc/rtl/index.html
I was looking for something like..
AnsiCompareStr Sysutils
DaySpan dateutils
Oops, wrong link, I meant:
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/fpcdoc/rtl/index-8.html
Vinc
El Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:25:01 -0500
Francisco Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Vincent Snijders writes:
>
> > e.g. http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/fpcdoc/rtl/index.html
>
> I was looking for something like..
>
>
> AnsiCompareStr Sysutils
> DaySpan dateutils
>
>
Here there's a
On Tue, December 9, 2008 22:25, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Vincent Snijders writes:
>
>> e.g. http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/fpcdoc/rtl/index.html
>
> I was looking for something like..
>
>
> AnsiCompareStr Sysutils
> DaySpan dateutils
>
>
> I have been using the PDF and searching for a
Marco van de Voort writes:
The index of the documentation comes a long way.
I have no idea what I was looking at, but went back to the rtl.pdf
and I see the index at the beginning with each function. Maybe was looking
at the online HTML. The beginning of the PDF is certainly along the lines
Vincent Snijders writes:
e.g. http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/fpcdoc/rtl/index.html
I was looking for something like..
AnsiCompareStr Sysutils
DaySpan dateutils
I have been using the PDF and searching for a function as needed.
Example.. when I was looking at fstat the example u
Bernd Mueller schrieb:
>> The compiler(s code generator) should take care of target cpu variants
>> and architectures.
>
> I think, this would be a lot of work. Which architecture should be
> implemented first? ARMv5 or better the latest ARMv7 (CORTEX) variants.
> But what about the Thumb/Thumb-2
I went: Options -> directories, and in "Units" the text box is empty. What must
I write there?
I run openSUSE 10.3, if that's important.
Thanks
Andres
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Cannot find GTK
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 10:43:18 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROT
Marco van de Voort schreef:
In our previous episode, Francisco Reyes said:
Is there a list of functions and which RTL libraries they belong to?
The index of the documentation comes a long way.
e.g. http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/fpcdoc/rtl/index.html
Vincent
Marc Santhoff wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 09.12.2008, 09:53 +0100 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
In our previous episode, Marc Santhoff said:
some small THUMB things, but FPC doesn't generate THUMB code).
One possible difference coming to my mind (although only a speed issue,
not influencing nonethel
I think they had to make a descision: Either against Microsoft or with
them. They chose to go with Microsoft so they now have to do everything
that supports M$ OSes and avoid everything that could drive users to
open source. In both ways there is no guaranty for success: If they try
to compete
Was it really more profitable for Borland to let Delphi nearly die?
Wouldn't they profit more if they kept investing (and in the correct
direction) but also had a larger market share then now?
I think they had to make a descision: Either against Microsoft or with
them. They chose to go with Mic
Go to www.freepascal.org
Select documentation
Scroll to the HTML docs
Select at Run-Time Library (RTL) units reference manual (with/without comments).
(I usually select without comments, but with could be a good idea too).
Select a unit.
Select Procedures and Functions
--
Felipe Monteiro de
In our previous episode, Francisco Reyes said:
> Is there a list of functions and which RTL libraries they belong to?
The index of the documentation comes a long way.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org
Is there a list of functions and which RTL libraries they belong to?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Am Dienstag, den 09.12.2008, 09:53 +0100 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> In our previous episode, Marc Santhoff said:
> > > some small THUMB things, but FPC doesn't generate THUMB code).
> >
> > One possible difference coming to my mind (although only a speed issue,
> > not influencing nonetheless w
On the positive side they dumped Delphi for .NET and implemented
Unicode support. Maybe they are recovering from the last decade of ill
management?
There is just something I don't get about some business. Delphi is
similar to Palm in my oppinion. It was a very popular technology and
then it's deve
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Either way, the .NET dependency IS a big hindrance for a lot of their clients,
> and obviously they are (again) not listening. But what else is new ?
Exactly, they don't learn! And luckily the old Delphi-maintaine
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> They keep going on about the .NET dependency justification in the IDE,
> >> saying they didn't want to reinvent the wheel!
> >
> > What kind of nonsense is t
Sometimes I just understand those guys.
I meant: "Sometime I just *don't* understand those guys."
Sorry for the typo. :)
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Bernd Mueller wrote:
Aleksa Todorovic wrote:
So, the situation is like this:
1) Target ARM architecture needs to be "told" to FPC since FPC needs
this information to do correct code generation.
At least up to fpc 2.2.2, the compiler does not use any information
about the ARM architecture. Th
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> > Afaik it is not even a direct .NET dependancy, but a Java dependancy that
> > they chose to resolve via J#->.NET.
>
> Is J# still being developed? I have seen or heard anything about J# in ages.
No idea. Just know this because it was mentione
Op dinsdag 09-12-2008 om 16:32 uur [tijdzone +1030], schreef Eric March:
> Hi
> I am running Ubuntu kernel 2.6 64bit.
> and FPC 2.2 and getting errors on MYSQL opens.
> Lazarus people say I should install FPC 2.2.3
> I tried to link into the Australian mirror and download
> a .deb package but get a
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Afaik it is not even a direct .NET dependancy, but a Java dependancy that
> they chose to resolve via J#->.NET.
Is J# still being developed? I have seen or heard anything about J# in ages.
Regards,
- Graeme -
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> They keep going on about the .NET dependency justification in the IDE,
>> saying they didn't want to reinvent the wheel!
>
> What kind of nonsense is that ? What does .NET dependency in the IDE
> have to do with r
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> >
> > They keep going on about the .NET dependency justification in the IDE,
> > saying they didn't want to reinvent the wheel!
>
> What kind of nonsense is that ? What does .NET dependency in the IDE
> have to do with reinventing the wheel ?
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:33 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FPC's FCL and Lazarus' LCL is very much similar and compatible with Delphi's
> > (as product) VCL. Having single codebase for different platforms and OSes is
> > not that hard, though i
Aleksa Todorovic wrote:
So, the situation is like this:
1) Target ARM architecture needs to be "told" to FPC since FPC needs
this information to do correct code generation.
At least up to fpc 2.2.2, the compiler does not use any information
about the ARM architecture. There is one runtime che
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Not an open source project, but it shows it can be
>> done.
>
> Sure it can - but is it worth time?
Exactly. Other that a "cool" or "wow" factor. :-)
I'd say if whoever has enough drive to try something like this, simp
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:33 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FPC's FCL and Lazarus' LCL is very much similar and compatible with Delphi's
> (as product) VCL. Having single codebase for different platforms and OSes is
> not that hard, though in some special cases it can't be 100% single codebase
>
In our previous episode, Andres Linares said:
> I was trying with some examples about using the GTK library in the
> FreePascal IDE (the blue screen) and it says that this unit is missing.
> Despite that, I could compile them all using fpc from the command
> interpreter.
>
> What is happenning? Is
In our previous episode, Marc Santhoff said:
> > some small THUMB things, but FPC doesn't generate THUMB code).
>
> One possible difference coming to my mind (although only a speed issue,
> not influencing nonetheless working code):
>
> There are some ARM7 (and maybe ARM9, not sure) core variants
Thank you for your reply.
Eclipse was first released as a Java development IDE several years ago, but
if you take a look at the Eclipse web site www.eclipse.org you'll see that
since then Eclipse has evolved and been extended to support Ruby, Python,
C/C++.
The suggestion I was making is there is
Hi
I am running Ubuntu kernel 2.6 64bit.
and FPC 2.2 and getting errors on MYSQL opens.
Lazarus people say I should install FPC 2.2.3
I tried to link into the Australian mirror and download
a .deb package but get an error that the location is
unavailable.
I have FPC 2.2 installed and need help on
37 matches
Mail list logo
