On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since I can save a lot of work depending on this orders I'd like to do
> so. ;)
Could you explain, I don't fully understand your statement.
> Is there any argument speaking against assuming fixed order behaviour?
One o
Hello
Thanks for that reply ... and yes I meant IA32
A few additional points if I may ..
When you say the FP supports the ARM architecture my specific question is
how does FP 'inform' the GNU assembler back end of which ARM architecture is
intended ...
The following is just a snippet from the
Hi,
currently I'm observing the following behaviour:
- test cases are run in the order of their registration
- testing procedures (per test) are run in the order of their
declaration in the test class
Since I can save a lot of work depending on this orders I'd like to do
so. ;)
Is there any arg
On 06 Dec 2008, at 23:32, Prince Riley wrote:
After reading the manuals I see that FP uses the GNU tools as back-
ends and
they support ARM ... but it that the extent of the support here.
For example, the ASM directive in FP targets the IA33 processor
semantics/syntax ...not ARM ..
I guess y
Hello
I have read on the wiki that FP supports ARM.. which I find very
interesting..
After reading the manuals I see that FP uses the GNU tools as back-ends and
they support ARM ... but it that the extent of the support here.
For example, the ASM directive in FP targets the IA33 processor
semanti
Hi all,
something i just read at http://www.firebirdnews.org and in Marco
Cantu's blog ( http://blog.marcocantu.com/blog/coderage_2008_closing.html )
regards,
--
Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Hi,
I'm trying hard to make a package thatfits inside fpc/packages/extra.
Most things do work, but some details are missing still.
How and where is the setting made that directs the output of package
compilation to $targetos/something and the installation target path?
A typical packages/extra Ma
Thanks for the answer.
I wanted to do it using Firebird instead of my Pascal code.. now I
understand thanks to you, that I need to do it using stored procedure.
Thanks,
Ido
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Francisco Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> ik writes:
>
>
> I wish to create a firebird
ik writes:
I wish to create a firebird generator that does bitwise generation rather
then ordinal generator.
I mean:
1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 etc..
Does anyone have knowledge how to create such generation in firebird ?
I am not clear what you are trying to do.
You are trying to generate the s
Micha Nelissen writes:
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Trying the fstat function and don't seem to be getting the right values
for ctime, mtime and atime.
What OS and CPU ?
Tried FreeBSD 6.3 on i386, AMD CPU and Opensuse 10.3 64 bits AMD cpu
___
fpc-pascal
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 06 Dec 2008, at 11:21, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
>> I know this is a bit off-topic in this mailing list
>
> Indeed. Please use the fpc-other list for this sort of questions. All
Sorry, I didn't know there was another m
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How far did you guys get with the 'fpwm' project? Did it actually run
> at some point. I see the last code changes was 2 years ago.
I think it was able to run, but wouldn't do much.
Too many other tasks at hand, and t
On 06 Dec 2008, at 11:21, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I know this is a bit off-topic in this mailing list
Indeed. Please use the fpc-other list for this sort of questions. All
replies to this list will be reject. It is not polite to inundate
people who are only here for asking and reading ab
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Andres Linares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to write Gnome Applets using GTK on Pascal? Do somebody know
> about this?
Sure it is possible, but I don't know if there are already translated
bindings for the required library. The translation job is usua
Hi
I know this is a bit off-topic in this mailing list, but I also know
that asking this question here will give me unbiased answers.
My daytime job is secure and I am a very happy Object Pascal
developers. I'm a firm believer in rather learning one language and
being very proficient in it, that b
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Skybuck Flying <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1. Using automatic conversion from C to Pascal but then the code would still
> have to be checked by humans.
I can just imagine it will generate ugly code. I would much rather
imagine that a clean design with a good obje
Hello,
I wish to create a firebird generator that does bitwise generation rather
then ordinal generator.
I mean:
1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 etc..
Does anyone have knowledge how to create such generation in firebird ?
Thanks,
Ido
http://ik.homelinux.org/
_
Ok, so lots of code...
Two possibilities come to mind:
1. Using automatic conversion from C to Pascal but then the code would still
have to be checked by humans.
2. Only convert certain portions which are most interesting to people.
For example:
Linux's tcp/ip stack.
Linux gui.
So that fo
In our previous episode, Guillermo Mart?nez Jim?nez said:
> > I think the problem here (again) is not the language, it's the critical
> > mass of users of the language. Using C for Linux was a good bet, not
> > because the language is good (Pascal is way better for me), but because C
> > has a w
>> How could Linus Torvalds write the core
of Linux in rather short time, single-handed, if it is such a huge task
just to port it?
Because he didn't really write it from scratch, instead he just improves
what's already there (Unix source code, maybe?) and poing! Linux comes up.
--
View this me
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Trying the fstat function and don't seem to be getting the right values
for ctime, mtime and atime.
What OS and CPU ?
Micha
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinf
21 matches
Mail list logo
